Category Archives for All

Part 3: How To Determine Your Share Of The Property Pool

10 Minute Separation Split.

Part 3: Determining Future Needs

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Part 3: Determining Future Needs

We can all agree that there's a lot of uncertainty surrounding the future when going through a separation.  

You're probably worried about where you're going to be living and how you're going to support yourself and any children you have without your former partner in the picture.

These worries are completely normal, and we understand how these thoughts can make you feel anxious about your future.

Well, in this video, part 3 of how to determine your share of the property pool, I'm going to take you through some of the key things you need to consider when looking at yours and your former spouse's future needs. 

You can feel assured that this is exactly the same process we use for all of our clients, so let's get started.

Stage 1 - Care Of Children

What are future needs in relation to children?

Care of the children including the capital costs of the children not covered by periodic child support payments. 

The court recognizes that the payment of child support does not compensate the primary carer for:

  • the loss of career opportunity;
  • the lack of employment mobility; and
  • the restriction on an independent lifestyle.

As a result, this needs to be considered when determining how much of the property pool you get.

Stage 2 - Earning Capacity & Financial Resources

Family Lawyer talking to client

What are future needs in relation to earning capacity & financial resources?

There may be a great difference in earning capacity between you and your former spouse. If you're the lower income earner, you may be entitled to an adjustment of property in your favor for that reason. 

The rationale behind this is that usually there may be a difference in earning capacity because of the relationship and the roles each party chose to play in that relationship. 

This is particularly common in long relationships. 

The court will also look at any financial resources you or your former spouse may have such as an entitlement to an inheritance or an interest in a family trust, anything that may result in either party receiving some amount of money.

Stage 3 - Health

What are future needs in relation to health?

The court will look at the age, state and health of each party.  

If you suffer from a health condition that impacts your ability to work or earn a living, this is a relevant factor.

You may have a health condition that requires extensive care and attention, and this will also be relevant. 

If you're nearing retirement age, and you're the primary income earner, the court will also look at this and consider that as relevant.

Stage 4 - Standard Of Living

What are future needs in relation to yours and your spouse's standard of living?

The court will look at what the standard of living was during the relationship. For example, whether the parties lived a substantial lifestyle and whether one party is still enjoying that lifestyle and the other is not.  

If one person is still enjoying a substantial lifestyle while the other is struggling to get bills paid, the court may adjust the share each person receives. This is so that there isn't a huge difference in financial quality of life.

Those are some of the main things you need to consider when determining what your future needs are and how this impacts what you might be entitled to in a property settlement.

If you have any trouble or have any questions regarding this video, or your separation, feel free to contact us on 1300 767 384 or you can email us at [email protected].

Otherwise, you can move on to the final video, Part 4: Calculating Your Share of the Property Pool.

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Part 2: How To Determine Your Share Of The Property Pool

10 Minute Separation Split.

Part 2: Assessing Financial & Non-Financial Contributions

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Part 2: Assessing Financial & Non-Financial Contributions.

It's fair to say that what you put into a relationship is more than just financial contributions. 

You've got the cooking, the cleaning, the washing, fixing the light bulbs, and even mowing your lawn every second weekend.

These tasks help build, acquire, and maintain assets that now need to be split. So, they can be just as important as financial contributions.

Only question is, how do you put a monetary value on a task like mowing the lawn or doing the dishes?

Well, in this video, part two of how to determine your share of the property pool, I'm going to take you through all of the financial and non-financial contributions, as well as the homemaker contributions that can be seen as having a monetary value.

Even if it didn't directly take money out of your pocket. 

After that, we are going to figure out what your total contribution has been.

Before we begin, I recommend you download the "Part Two: Assess Financial and Non-financial Contributions" worksheet, so we can work through the steps together. You can download this from the link below:

Once you've got that, let's get into it.

Stage 1 - Financial Contributions

What are financial contributions?

Financial contributions are contributions made directly or indirectly by you or your former spouse to the acquisition, conservation, or improvement of any property that either of you may own or have previously owned during the relationship.

For example:

  • Yours or their income;
  • Savings or other money brought into the relationship;
  • Payments on a deposit;
  • Loan repayments;
  • Other payments of expenses such as renovations, water, gas, electricity, car servicing;

Or anything else that maintained or improved an asset or property you or your former spouse owned, like a house, car, or a business.

These financial contributions can also include any work or other financial contributions someone else makes on your behalf.

For example, if you received an inheritance or a personal injury payment.

NOTE:  It's important to note, you need to include the contributions made before cohabitation, so that is before you lived together, during cohabitation or marriage, whether or not you were married yet or de facto, and after your separation.

1

Step One.

List all of the financial contributions that you or your former spouse made to the relationship BEFORE you lived together.

If you take a look at the example below you'll see an example of some financial contributions a wife and husband made before cohabitation.


So, that is what you had when you started living together.


In this example, the husband contributed $35,000 in savings, as well as having a $50,000 payment on a house ready to go. The wife on the other hand just contributed the $15,000 in savings she had at the time.


So go to section 1  of your worksheet. Here you will find table 1a (the first red table) which will be the same table as the example above.

Here you will need to list any financial contributions you or your former spouse made before living together. 

2

Step Two.

List all of the financial contributions that you or your former spouse made DURING the relationship (when married or living together).

Now we are going to look at the contributions during the relationship. 

So, if you look at the example below the financial contributions during the relationship were:

  • mortgage repayments & gas, electricity and water bills for the 8 years they were together;
  • the $8,000 they spent each to renovate the kitchen;
  • the husband also received an inheritance of $100,000 from his parents; and 
  • the wife received $70,000 from a personal injury payment.

So go to section 1  of your worksheet. Here you will find table 1b (the second red table) which will be the same table as the example above.

Here you will need to list any financial contributions you or your former spouse made during the relationship while married or living together. 

3

Step Three.

List all of the financial contributions that you or your former spouse made AFTER separating.

Next, we are going to look at all the financial contributions made after you separated. 

That may continue to be mortgage repayments, or electricity, or gas because someone needs to keep paying the expenses on that property.

So, those, in this example below are the financial contributions after separation. 

So, now, have a go at filling in yours and your former spouse's financial contributions after separation in section 1 table 1c of the worksheet (the third red table)

4

Step Four.

Total all of the financial contributions that you or your former spouse made.

Finally, we are going to total both yours and your former spouse's financial contributions.

To do this we are going to add up all of your financial contributions that you made before living together, during marriage/ cohabitation and after separation.  So you can see in the example below this is noting down all your financial contributions and adding these all up.  

And then doing the same for your former spouse's column. 

So, now, go ahead and filing in and add up your own orange table - total table 1 in section 1 of the worksheet.

And that's it for financial contributions. 

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Stage 2 - Non-Financial Contributions

What are non-financial contributions?

They are similar to financial contributions in the sense that they're made directly or indirectly by you or your former spouse to the acquisition, conservation, or improvement of any of the property of the parties.

BUT, they are NOT made with money or payment.

For example:

  • Home improvements such as renovations or labor to a property that you've done yourself that's added value to that property;
  • You've helped manage your spouse's business; or
  • You've managed the finances of the relationship.

In non-financial contributions we don't take into account the non-financial contributions pre-living together. We just look at the non-financial contributions made during and after the relationship. 

NOTE:  Do not at this stage include things like washing, cleaning, cooking, or general yard maintenance. People often get these confused. Those are homemaker contributions that we are going to deal with next. But for this stage, leave those things out. 

1

Step One.

List all of the non-financial contributions that you or your former spouse made DURING the relationship while you were married or living together.

In the example below you can see that the husband made majority of the non-financial contributions during the relationship taking on the tasks of home improvements such as painting the inside and outside of the house. He also undertook the management of finances for the couple personally and for the business they owned together.  

So go ahead and fill in your non-financial contributions you and your spouse made while married or living together. Fill this in in table 2a of section 2 of your worksheet (the first red table of section 2).

2

Step Two.

List all of the non-financial contributions that you or your former spouse made AFTER separating.

The main non-financial contribution we see after separating is home improvement. 

For example, you might separate and decide that the property has to be sold. One party might do some improvements to the property, like painting the property, to add value to it to get it ready for sale. Therefore this is a non-financial contribution that occurred after separating that needs to be considered.

Consider both your and your former spouses non-financial contributions post-separation and then note these down in table 2b (the second red table of section two of the worksheet).

After you have completed both steps then you can move on to stage 3. 

Stage 3 - Homemaker Contributions

What are homemaker contributions?

These are contributions made by a party to the welfare of the family, including in your capacity as homemaker or parent.

For example:

  • caring for the children is the obvious one;
  • cooking meals;
  • cleaning;
  • mowing the lawn;
  • driving the children to and from school or their co-curricular activities.
1

Step One.

List all of the homemaker contributions that you or your former spouse made DURING the relationship while you were married or living together.

Again, this doesn't have that pre-relationship step, because there really can't be homemaker contributions before the relationship.

In the table below we have listed some examples of homemaker contributions that may have happened during the relationship.

We've got things like home maintenance, cooking, cleaning, washing. Here in table 3a of section 3 of the worksheet you will need to list both yours and your former spouse's homemaker contributions. With each contribution you will need to assign a percentage of who did what. Don't be too particular with these percentages, you will most likely know who did the majority of the cooking and who mainly looked after the children. For example, don't assign 3% for the few times you cleaned the house while your partner did the cleaning majority of the time. 

NOTE: Looking after the children tends to be the biggest contributions we look at in terms of homemaker contributions. Looking after the children can be a massive contribution to the relationship especially in cases where you have had several children or your child had health issues. In cases such as these there can be more running around to different activities and there can be more doctors' appointments, specialist appointments. So, pay particular attention to noting this down.

The common example we see is where the husband's earned the money. He's gone out and worked all of the relationship. The wife has stayed home to raise the kids. In this situation, if mum had not raised the kids, dad wouldn't have been able to go out and earn the income that he did. 

So go ahead and fill in table 3a of the worksheet (the first red table of section 3).

2

Step Two.

List all of the homemaker contributions that you or your former spouse made AFTER separating.

Next we are going to do the same for the homemaker contributions made after separation.

They tend to be similar to the homemaker contributions made during the relationship as seen in the example below.

Obviously, even after you separate, the kids need to be cared for, and taken to school, and taken to co-curricular activities. The property still needs to be cleaned, cooking, washing, all those sorts of things. These tasks carry on even after separation. 

So have a go at filling in yours and your former spouse's homemaker contributions after separation in table 3b of the worksheet (the second red table of section 3).

Consider both your and your former spouses non-financial contributions post-separation and then note these down in table 2b (the second red table of section two of the worksheet).

Stage 4 - Assess The Contributions

In this final stage we are going to briefly assess the contributions.

In terms of the weight given to each of these types of contributions, they do depend on a variety of factors, such as:

  • The size of the property pool. 

So, you'll remember in a previous video we worked out the value of the property pool - that will be relevant to the weight of contributions;

  • The length of the relationship.

In shorter relationships, financial contributions tend to be given more weight than in long relationships. In long relationships, not much weight is given to higher earnings, where there was a merging of efforts. For example, when dad went out and earned the money and mum stayed home and raised the kids.

  • Large lump sums such as inheritances or personal injury payments received later in the relationship.

These are given more weight than if they were received early on in the relationship.

We will go over this weighting in more depth in Part Four when we calculate a rough figure on what you may be entitled to. 

In the meantime, you can move on to Part Three, Determining Your Future Needs, because you have completed all four stages of Part Two.

As always, if you have any questions regarding this video or your separation, feel free to contact us on 1300 767 384 or you can email us at [email protected].

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Part 4: How To Determine Your Share Of The Property Pool

10 Minute Separation Split.

Part 4: Calculating Your Share

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Part 4: Calculating Your Share.

Congratulations, you've made it to part four.

You've put in the hard yards, you've finished both worksheets and three videos so far and now it's time to calculate a figure.

To do that, we're going to go over the information you've noted down so far, so you'll need to have completed both worksheet one and worksheet two and have these open nearby. 

Worksheet  1 & 2:

Then we will work through an example together and calculate a rough percentage and figure of entitlement allowing you to do the same with your own information.

So, let's get into it.

Stage 1 - Reviewing assets, contributions & future needs

As mentioned before, I'm going to go through an example situation and based on their information, calculate a rough percentage and figure that the husband and wife may be entitled to. 

As I'm working through this example, you will need to make similar assessments of your own situation and information that you have noted down in the worksheets.

Let's get into our example.

Sarah and William began living together in September, 2000. After three years they were married in January, 2003. 15 years later, their marriage broke down and they decided to separate in October, 2018.

First, let's just briefly go over Sarah and William's assets. 

At the present day, Sarah and William have combined net assets of $537,500 which includes:    

  • superannuation;
  • the family home;
  • some shares;
  • cash in the bank;
  • furniture;
  • a car; and
  • the husband's company.

You would have noted your own net assets down in table one of worksheet one.

In terms of financial resources, William is a beneficiary in the Smith family trust. This is a discretionary trust control by William's father. Historically, William has received distributions between 15 and $20,000 each year depending on how much his father decides to distribute to him.   

Sarah is also due to receive $40,000 in cash in her mother's final will. Her mother is still alive, but she has been given six months to live.

NOTE:  At the present day though, and importantly to note, Sarah's mother has lost testamentary capacity. This means that legally she cannot alter her will, so the will as it currently stands is what Sarah is likely to receive.

Because Sarah's mother is alive, although she's lost testamentary capacity, she is still alive and there's no guarantee that she will actually pass away in six months.

At this stage, that entitlement is considered a financial resource and not an asset. Once Sarah receives the $40,000 or is due to receive it, after her mother passes away, then it will be considered an asset. 

You will also have noted this information down about any financial resources you or your former spouse have in table two of worksheet one.

Now let's get to financial contributions.

Initial Financial Contributions

In terms of financial contributions that Sarah and William brought in when they first started living together, Sarah had $10,000 in savings, $8,000 in shares, a motor vehicle worth approximately $5,000 and around $45,000 in superannuation.

William on the other hand, brought in $80,000 in savings, a motor vehicle worth approximately $12,000 and superannuation of approximately $55,000. 

You will have noted down your own financial contributions before you began living together in worksheet two table 1A. If you haven't yet note these down now before continuing on any further.

You will have noted down your own financial contributions before you began living together in worksheet two table 1A. If you haven't yet note these down now before continuing on any further.

Financial Contributions While Living Together

During the relationship, Sarah received a gift from her parents as $30,000 in 2016. She was also made redundant at work and received a redundancy payment of $15,000 in 2004, both of which were contributed as payments to the mortgage.

William, on the other hand, received an inheritance during the relationship from his late mother's estate in 2006 this was to the value of a $100,000.

$50,000 of this inheritance was put towards the mortgage and the remaining $50,000 was spent on renovations to the property ($30,000) and a family holiday ($20,000). 

While living together Sarah was working as a full-time bank teller earning approximately 40,000 per annum. She ultimately stopped working in 2004 when their first child was born and has been a full-time homemaker since then.

William, however, has been a qualified engineer since before he met Sarah. From the time they began living together in 2000 up until 2015 William was employed by a business where he earned approximately $220,000 a year.

In 2015 William decided to start his own business and he now pays himself a salary of approximately $150,000 per year.

Financial Contributions After Separation

Since separating, William has continued to pay the mortgage repayments on the property. William's also paid for the paint to repaint the interior and the exterior of the property.

Now we'll move on to the non-financial contributions.

Non-Financial Contributions While Living Together

In terms of non-financial contributions, Sarah would assist William with the bookkeeping for his business once he started it. However, for the most part, the business was operated completely by William.

The assistance stopped when Sarah and William separated.

William also managed the family's finances up until separation.

Non-Financial Contributions After Separation

When separated William made a large non-financial contribution. This was in the form of his own personal labor in painting the interior and the exterior of the property, preparing it for sale and ultimately increasing the property's value.

Now we'll move onto homemaker contributions.

Homemaker Contributions While Living Together

In terms of homemaker contributions during the relationship, Sarah was responsible for the cooking, cleaning, and washing with William occasionally assisting with cooking on the weekends.

William would undertake the yard maintenance such as mowing the lawns and trimming the hedges but other home maintenance was largely up to Sarah.

Sarah and William had two children together during their relationship. Sally, who was born in August of 2004 and Thomas, who was born in October of 2008 making the children 14 and 10 years respectively at today's date.

During the relationship Sarah was the primary care of the children. She would get them to school, assist them with their homework, do the bed and bath routine.

William would assist on weekends when he was home from work but for the most part, Sarah was responsible for the day-to-day care of the children.

Homemaker Contributions After Separation

As Sarah and William no longer lived together the children now they've primarily with Sarah in the family home. They stay with William every second weekend. 

As Sarah was now the only one living in the matrimonial home all of the cooking, cleaning, washing, and home maintenance was performed solely by her.

Now we'll look at future needs. 

In terms of future needs neither Sarah or William have any known health issues, meaning they do not require extra financial support at this stage in their lives.

However, Sarah does not hold any qualifications past her high school certificate. She's been out of the workforce since 2004 until she recently obtained a retail position at David Jones earning approximately $50,000 per annum.

The children attend private schools and William has agreed to continue to pay for their school fees until the children finish school.

Sarah and William also have a private agreement in which William will pay Sarah $350 per week in child support.

You should also think about the future needs you and your former spouse have that we went through in part three.

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Stage 2 - Calculating Your Share Of The Property Pool

Now considering all of this information, let's calculate your share of the property pool.

In my case I'll be calculating Sarah's share of the property pool.

In Sarah's situation she would be entitled to somewhere within the range of 55% to 65%.

This is based on a 8 main things: 

  1. 1
    It was a long relationship

Because Sarah and William's relationship was approximately 18 years the court will tend to weight non-financial and financial contributions somewhat equal.

They say that there was a merging of efforts throughout the 18 years and that William went to work and earned the income he did and he could do that because Sarah was at home raising the children and running the household.

In situations where your relationship was shorter. For example, if it was only a three or four year relationship, the financial contributions of a person would be given much more weight than they would in Sarah and William's situation.

  1. 2
    William has a far greater earning capacity

The next thing is that William has a far greater earning capacity compared to Sarah.

Sarah earns approximately $50,000 working at David Jones and that's probably all she can earn into the near future. William on the other hand, runs his own business he pays himself a wage of $150,000. However, historically as an employed engineer, he was earning up around that $220,000 mark.

William has the capacity to earn and does earn much more than Sarah. 

  1. 3
    Sarah has primary care of the children

As we mentioned earlier, William picks them up every second Friday and has them until Monday morning. Other than that, Sarah is primarily responsible for getting the kids to school, getting their homework done, cleaning for them, cooking for them, doing all of those things that limit her ability to work long hours.

  1. 4
    Sarah's financial contributions

Sarah made financial contributions with the $30,000 from her parents and the $15,000 from her redundancy.

Again, those are two things that went directly into the property pool that added to the value of it.

  1. 5
    William's financial contributions

William, on the other hand, had that significant financial contribution in the form of not only his increased income but the lump sum payment received from his inheritance, that $100,000.

While, $20,000 was spent on a holiday, $80,000 was applied to the mortgage and increasing the value of the home, so he does get something for that.

William's adjustment for that big inheritance though is lessened because it was received early on in their relationship. If, for example, he received that inheritance towards the end of the relationship or even after separation, it would be given much greater weight than it was being received much earlier on.

  1. 6
    William's initial financial contributions

We also look at William's initial financial contributions. They were obviously larger than Sarah's, but again, in a long relationship, your initial financial contributions are given much less weight over time than they would have been if it was, say a three or four year relationship.

  1. 7
    Sarah's interest in her mother's estate

Even though Sarah's interest in her mother's estate is not huge, it is something that she is likely to receive.

As we said, it's at this stage still a financial resource as it's something that Sarah is likely to receive but has not yet received. Even though she has not received it yet, the court can't ignore that she's going to receive it at some point.

  1. 8
    William's interest in the family trust

William's financial resource in being a beneficiary in the family trust is also something the court can't ignore. Yes, it is uncertain on if he will receive anything and how much William will receive, if he does, but historically he has received $15,000 - $20,000 each year. 

In this case, if Sarah negotiated with William and they agreed to, split the assets, 60% to Sarah and 40% to William because of all of the reasons above then the overall split might look something like this: 

You'll see the property might be sold. In that Sarah might receive $207,500 and William will receive the balance.

Now we've got to those cash adjustments because we take what each party already has in their possession.

Sarah is going to receive all the furniture in that property. She's going to receive the cash at bank and she's already got shares in her name and superannuation in her name.

William already has a car, he's got his company and he's got his super and then he's obviously got a little credit card debt there.

We take what each party already has, and then in order to top them up to that 60/40 split that they've agreed to, that is how the cash component is calculated.

If you're unsure and want some help with this I'm providing free calculations to help people determine their share of the property pool.

Simply click the button, Get a Free Personal Net Worth Calculation, fill in the form and I'll give you a call so we can discuss your situation confidentially.

Simply click the button:

Then fill in the form and I'll give you a call so we can discuss your situation confidentially.

Alternatively, if you've just got some questions about this video or your separation in general, feel free to contact us on 1300 767 384 or you can email us at [email protected].

But other than that, you're all finished!

You've completed all four parts of the video series and hopefully have calculated your share of the property pool.

All that's left is to:

  1. 1
    Reach an agreement on this split with your former spouse.
  2. 2
    Check that the division of assets is just & equitable.

This simply means checking that it's fair. Making sure, for example, practically that one part is not ending up with a bunch of superannuation and the other party is walking away with all of the cash. The split, while the percentage might be fair, you need to make sure that the actual practical split is also fair. 

  1. 3
    Finally, finalise the agreement.

You can do this through either consent orders or a binding financial agreement and we can assist with either of those.

Part 1: How To Determine Your Share Of The Property Pool

10 Minute Separation Split.

Part 1: Identifying Assets & Debts

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Part 1: Identifying Assets & Debts.

We can all agree that going through a separation can be stressful.

You are probably feeling unsure of what your future may hold. Uncertain about what you will be left with. Maybe even concerned about what your quality of life will be going forward. 

In situations like these, what most of us want is to simply get a better idea of what we may be entitled to. 

Well, in this video, I'm going to take you through part one of a four part method, that works out what assets and property you may be entitled to.

Replacing those feelings of confusion and uncertainty with feelings of relief and clarity.

This how-to video is broken into four parts, as calculating your share of the assets is no simple task. 

We don't want you getting to the end of one big video feeling overwhelmed, thinking: 

What am I meant to do next?

So, for this video, we're just going to take you through part one - Identifying yours and your spouse's assets and debts.

NOTE: It's really important to note that when we look at the assets and the debts, to determine how to divide them, we're looking at them as at today's date. That is the day that either you settle by agreement, or the day that a court determines your matter.

It is not the date of separation.

So that means, even if you separate now and you don't resolve your matter for another two years, you take the assets as at the date of resolution, not separation. So all of your assets and debts continue to accumulate together.

By doing this from the get-go, you won't have to spend time doing it with a lawyer.

We give you this option to do it yourself, because we understand that getting a property settlement is not cheap, so we want to save you money where we can.

So let's get started, by jumping into the questions we ask all of our clients when working out their share of the net assets, otherwise known as the property pool.

Stage 1 - Quantifiable Assets & Debts

Before we go through how to identify your quantifiable assets and debts, I recommend you download the Part One Identifying Assets and Debts Worksheet, so we can work through the steps together. 

You can download this here:

1

Step One.

List all of the assets either you or your former spouse may have at today's date.

An asset is property which each spouse may be entitled to, whether in possession or whether they have a right to possess or own it.

NOTE: It's important to note that the definition of assets for family law purposes is very different to the ordinary asset description or Australian Accounting Standards description of what an asset is.

So go to section 1  of your worksheet. Here you will find table 1 that looks like the image below.

Here you will need to list any assets you or your former spouse may have and who owns each asset. For example list any properties, shares, cash in the bank and any superannuation either of you may have.

2

Step Two.

List all of the debts either you or your former spouse may have at today's date.

A debt is money owing (obviously), but it's a debt that must be likely to be enforced. So you saying that your mum lent you $10,000 twenty years ago, in circumstances where you:

  • haven't made any attempts to repay that money in twenty years;
  • there's been no interest accruing; and
  • there's no loan agreement

is unlikely to be included in the property pool. It must be a debt that is likely to be recovered.

Examples of a debt are things like a mortgage, a credit card, a debt to the ATO. Anything that as I say, is likely to be enforced and called in. 

So go to the second half of table 1 and fill out any debts and the ownership of each debt, and then we can move onto the next step.

3

Step Three.

List the estimated value of each asset and debt.

So if you have a look at column number three in table one, you'll see the value column. Now let's try and attribute a value to each asset and debt.

It might just be your best estimate at this stage. We'll talk about formal valuations further on in this article and what to do when you and your spouse don't agree on what the value is. However, for the mean time we're just going to have our best bet.

As you can see in my example, the house might be worth $500,000, the car may be worth $25,000.

You can have a look online at Red Book or get a real estate appraisal, just to get an idea of an estimated value for the purpose of this stage.

After that we're going to do the same with debts. 

Debts are often a lot easier to quantify, because they can be based off things like mortgage statements, or credit card statements, so you know exactly what might be owing to a bank.

So go ahead and fill in the value column of table one, and then we'll move on to the next step.

4

Step Four.

Total the value of the net assets.

To do this, we add up all of the assets and then we minus all of the debts to arrive at a net figure.

So you'll see here in the table, we've got all of the assets listed above and their values. We're going to add all of those up. We're going to include super, because remember, superannuation is an asset. And then we're going to minus all of the debts, and we're going to arrive at a net figure.

You'll see on the example that the net figure in this situation is $397,500. That is the net figure that we're ultimately going to divide.

So do that in your worksheet. Total all of the net assets and note it down in table one. 

Then you have complete stage 1 - quantifiable assets and debts.

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

Stage 2 - Unquantifiable Financial Resources

Now let's take a look at unquantifiable financial resources.

So what is a financial resource & what makes it unquantifiable? 

A financial resource is anything that can generate income or the reasonable expectation of receiving income. It's different to an asset in that it can't really be quantified.

Examples of a financial resource might be an interest in a family trust, or an interest in an estate. Something that, as I say, isn't exactly quantifiable. For example, if you are a beneficiary in a discretionary family trust, historically you may have received distributions every year. You don't know what amounts those distributions will be. You'll don't know whether you'll be getting any this year, so it's a financial resource as opposed to an asset.

On the other hand, if, for example, you were the trustee of that trust, and it was up to you to determine how to distribute the income, well, then it may be considered an asset. However, if you have no control over it, and you don't know what you're likely to receive, it's more likely to be a financial resource.

So go to table 2 in your worksheet and fill in the financial resources and ownership column. There is an example below on how to do this. After you've finished that we'll move on to stage three.

Stage 3 - Disclose All Of Your Financial Interests

You both have a duty to the court and to each other, to make full and continuing disclosure of your financial circumstances to the other spouse.

So what do you have to disclose?

Firstly, disclosure is just making it known to your former spouse. 

Disclosure = making something known to your former spouse. 

What you have to disclose can vary, depending on which court you're in, but documents that are generally required to be disclosed are things like:

  • tax returns and notices of assessments;
  • superannuation member statements and a valuation of your super fund;
  • financial statements and BAS statements for company interests;
  • bank and credit card statements;
  • trust deeds, company constitutions, partnership agreements.

Those are just to name a few.

But what if your former spouse won't disclose?

You can subpoena certain documents and information if you're in court.

A subpoena is a document that compels the production of certain documents or information.

Subpoena = a document that compels someone or a business to give you access to certain documents or information. 

The benefit of issuing a subpoena is that generally you don't subpoena your former spouse. Instead you sort of go above their head, and subpoena the person that will actually have access to the documents.

For example, if your former spouse won't provide their bank statements, you'll instead subpoena the bank and the bank will provide those statements, rather than relying on your spouse to.

If you refer to section three of the worksheet, we've got a full checklist of everything you might have to disclose, depending on which court you're in.

Stage 4 - Independent Valuations

What do you do if you and your spouse don't agree on the value of the property pool, or of a particular asset or debt?

Anything not agreed on must be valued.

To value real estate, a registered valuer should be jointly instructed by you and your former spouse. This means you should agree on a valuer and tell the valuer to do the valuation.

To value things like motor vehicles, a Red Book value will often suffice.

Often, superannuation member statements are not entirely accurate, so you might have to do a superannuation valuation. We have provided a link to the form that you'll need to do that below:

A business can also be valued. That, again, will take you agreeing on a valuer and jointly instructing that valuer to undertake the valuation.

Often identifying the property pool's the hardest part of property settlement, and valuations and disclosure can take some time. But this step is so, so important. You need to know what it is you're dividing, before you can think about how you're going to divide it.

The more you do at the start, the easier this process will be overall.

Remember, you can't really make any offers of settlement until you know what your offer represents. You can't say, "I want 55% of something," when you don't know what 55% actually equals.

And that's it for part one! Now, when you're ready, you can move on to part two.

If you have any trouble or any questions regarding this video or your separation, feel free to contact us on 1300 767 384 or you can email us at [email protected].

Don't have the time to do it yourself?

Let us work out what you may be entitled to instead.

How To Determine Your Share Of The Property Pool

How To Determine Your Share Of The Property Pool.

Firstly, before any assets and property are divided, the Court will look at whether your assets and property should even be split legally.

The Court will usually say you can do so when both you and your former spouse/ partner are no longer living together. Along with this, no property will be commonly used by both of you anymore.

When this has been determined, you can move ahead with splitting your property. Which is where the next 4 step formula comes in handy.  

The only circumstances in which the Court will not do this is:

  • When you don't legally formalise the property settlement. Read about the pro's and con's of an informal property settlement here.
  • OR
  • When you reach an agreement with your former spouse/ partner outside of court and this is formalised via a binding financial agreement. This is discussed at the end of this article.

Even without the involvement of the Court you should take the following 4 step formula into consideration.

Step 1: Identify yours & your former spouse/partner's assets, liabilities, superannuation & financial resources.

This involves both you and your ex disclosing all of your assets. This includes assets owned personally, in a company, trust or other structure.

You both will also have to disclose any liabilities (debts), superannuation and any financial resources either of you have. 

Combined, this will make up the existing property pool. 

Step 2: Assess the financial and non-financial contributions of both you and your former spouse/partner.

When assessing the contributions you have both made to the relationship, look at both direct and indirect contributions. This can be financial contributions such as:

  • Paying the bills
  • Purchasing the family home
  • Need more examples here

And non-financial contributions such as:

  • Caring for children
  • Running the household
  • Need more examples here

Non-financial contributions can be weighted just as heavily as financial contributions, especially in long relationships. 

In shorter relationships with no children, financial contributions are generally given more weight.

Insert Image

Step 3: Assess the future needs of you and your former spouse/partner.

There are a few things that should be assessed when determining what your and your former spouse/ partner's future needs are. These are:

  • The income, property and financial resources each person has.
  • The physical and mental capacity of each person to gain appropriate employment.
  • Whether each person has care or control of a child of the relationship (who is under 18 years of age). 
  • The commitments of each person that are necessary to support themselves (and a child or other person they are responsible for).
  • The eligibility of each person to get a pension, allowance or benefit.
  • The duration of the relationship and the extent to which it has affected the earning capacity of the person who has not been employed. For example, leaving a job, going part time or reducing work capabilities to look after the children.
  • If either of you are cohabiting with another person and the financial circumstances relating to that cohabitation.

These are some of the things the Court will look at and therefore should be what you consider when assessing your and your ex's future needs. 

Based on your situation there may also be more circumstances that apply to you. If you wish to get further clarification on what else may be considered for your specific situation we provide free phone consultations with a free 3 step action plan. This is to ensure you get the clarification you need. As we understand going through a divorce/ separation is already a confusing time, without the extra confusion of all the legal stuff.

Insert Image

Step 4: Assess if the proposed division is just and equitable.

Lastly, what you should assess is if the division is practical and for your circumstances. 

For example, if one person is receiving only superannuation but cannot access this while the other is receiving cash, the percentage may be fair but the overall division may not be fair. This is something the Court may deem to be unfair. (add what will happen if the Court sees the proposed division as unfair).

Insert Image

What if we agree of the division of our property and just want to formalise our agreement?

You and your former spouse may have discussed or negotiated through lawyers and reached an agreement on how to split your property. If this is the case, and you just want to formalise this agreement you can do this one of two ways:

1. Consent Orders

Consent Orders are formal Court Orders, but don't worry, you don't need to attend Court. 

To get a Consent Order you simply must send the agreement to the Court in the appropriate forms (need more info here). The Court will then assess the agreement and, provided they think it is fair, they will make the agreement an Order.

2. Binding Financial Agreement

A binding financial agreement on the other hand, is a private agreement that doesn't go through the Courts.

However, this is something both you and your former spouse/partner will need legal advice on. This is because it is an agreement, similar to a contract, that you will both agree on and sign.

To make this information a bit more exact, practical and useful for you we have the following personal net worth calculator

This is a 51 page document that outlines the above into one comprehensive document. You can use this to take note of the information you may need to consider when working out a settlement. 

You can also have a qualified family lawyer specifically work out your worth for free by filling this document in and emailing it to [email protected] 

Now you know how to determine your potential entitlement, find out about the ways in which you can split your assets, parenting and finalise your divorce. As well as the price tag of each option.

Read: The Price Tag Of A Divorce

How To Get A Divorce In Australia

How To Get A Divorce In Australia

We can all agree that filing for divorce is not the greatest day in our lives, but, unfortunately, you're here. 

You've made up your mind and finally decided it's time to get a divorce. Only trouble is, you don't know how to get one.

The last thing you want after all that agony is to go round and round in circles trying to figure out how to make this thing final. 

What most of us want is to have our divorce application completed and submitted to the Court or, at least, we want to know what we need to do before we can file for divorce.

NOTE: It's really important to note that divorce is different from a property settlement. A divorce is going to legally end your marriage but it's not going to determine how your property and assets are divided.

Well, today, I'm going to show you how to do just that.

I'm going to show you how to go from being stuck in an unhappy marriage where you're unsure of the divorce process to knowing exactly how to submit your divorce application to the Court. 

So you can finally close that chapter and begin to move on.

We're going to do that in two stages.

  1. 1
    Stage one, we're going to make sure you're actually eligible for divorce.
  2. 2
    Stage two, we're going to show you how to submit that application to the Court.

We keep it in two stages as we aim to make things as simple as possible. 

We are doing this because we understand the complex emotions in a relationship breakdown so we don't want to add to your stress.

The method we're going to show you is exactly what we use in our family law practice and we've used it to get the right results for hundreds of clients.

So let's get started.

Stage 1: Let's make sure you're eligible for a divorce.

To be eligible for a divorce you must meet the following 4 point criteria.

1. You are in a legally valid marriage.

marriage breakdown

That means that it needs to be recognized by Australian law as valid. If you were married in Australia it's fairly easy to satisfy that. If you were married overseas, sometimes that can get a little bit difficult. 

Your marriage would not be considered valid, if, for example:

  • You or your spouse were married to someone else at the time of your marriage;
  • You or your spouse weren't of legal age;
  • You or your spouse are too closely related biologically
  • You or your spouse lacked the ability to give consent or were put under duress for the marriage.

When you lodge your application to the Court, you're going to have to file a certificate of marriage at the same time and that will help show the Court whether your marriage is valid or not.

If you were married overseas and that certificate's in another language you'll need to have that translated.

2. You or your spouse must be an Australia citizen or meet the following residency requirements.

how to get a divorce in Australia

The residency requirements are: 

  • You must have lived in Australia for 12 months immediately before filing your application for divorce; or 
  • You must intend to live in Australia indefinitely and regard Australia as your home.

3. You must consider your marriage to have irretrievably broken down.

Removing rind after a divorce

That basically means there's no chance of getting back together. 

The Court will not grant you a divorce if there is a reasonable likelihood of you both living together again. 

4. You and your spouse must have been separated for at least 12 months.

Separating from spouse

This is going to help show the Court that there is no chance of getting back together. 

It's really important to note that you can still be separated but living under one roof so if that is your case you'll need to file an affidavit with your application for divorce. An affidavit is a statement that you'll sign and lodge with the Court. In the affidavit you have to explain that even though you are living together you consider the relationship to be over.

If you're still not sure about whether you're eligible to get a divorce, you can take the quiz below. It will help you determine whether you're eligible or not.

Stage 2: How to submit your application for divorce to the Court.

Okay, stage two we're going to show you how to submit an application to Court. This is a five step process and I'm going to take you through all five steps now.

1. Complete your Application for Divorce online.

The following link below will take you to the Federal Court website which gives you some further information around applying for a divorce. More importantly this link will have a button near the bottom of the article which will take you to the divorce application portal. 

Within this portal you will need to register and then complete your application online. For more information on registering for the Commonwealth Courts Portal and eFiling an application for divorce go here.

An application is the form that you'll need to actually send to the Court to apply for your divorce. 

There's two ways to do that:

  • A joint application. This is where you and your former spouse will do it together. 
  • A solo application. This is where just you, yourself, sign and file that application.

A joint application is always going to be easier. If your former spouse is prepared to sign one with you, make sure you try that first.

2. File the Application.

file divorce application

File simply means submit it to the Court. 

When you submit it to the Court, there's a filing fee, as the lawyers like to call it, which is basically just a submission fee. That's pretty hefty, it's $900. You might be entitled to a reduction if you have a Commonwealth Healthcare Concession Card. 

Find out if you are entitled to a reduced fee here

Remember, if you're filing a joint application, you might be able to ask your former spouse whether they'll pay half of that fee but if you're filing a sole application, you'll have to pay the full fee on your own.

3. Serve your former spouse (only if doing a sole application).

signing a divorce application

If you're filing a joint application you can jump ahead and ignore this step. 

If you're filing a solo application, you must then serve your former spouse. Serve basically means you need to give them a copy of the application so that they're aware that you're filing an application for divorce.

You can do this in two ways:

  • Via post. Do this only if you think that your spouse is going to accept and sign that they have received the documents. When sending your spouse a copy of the documents, you will also need to send a form called an Acknowledgement of Service. Your spouse will then need to sign the form and send it back to you.
  • Personally. If you think there's no way your former spouse is going to agree to accept that by post or they're going to send that form back, then you'll need to personally serve them. That doesn't mean that you have to go on your own and personally serve them, anyone over the age of 18. It can be a family member, a friend or you can actually get professional process servers that know exactly what they're doing. They will serve a copy of that application on your former spouse. They will also ask at that time for your former spouse to sign the Acknowledgment Of Service. Following this you will then need to do an Affidavit Of Service.

4. File any service documents to the Court (only if doing a sole application).

submit extra documents for a divorce

If you did have to serve your spouse, you will need to submit (file) those service documents to the Court. Those service documents are the Acknowledgment Of Service that your former spouse signed and the Affidavit Of Service that the person who served the documents signed. 

For more information on how to eFile further documents to support my application for divorce go here.

5. Attend the divorce hearing (only if doing a sole application or there are children under the age of 18).

federal court for a divorce

Finally, you'll need to attend the divorce hearing. You'll only need to attend the divorce hearing if you filed a solo application and there are children under the age of 18.

Once you attend that hearing, the order will come into effect one month and one day after it is made. That is, one month and one day after the hearing date so you can't legally remarry until such time as that order has come into effect.

We always recommend to try a joint application first. This is because of the three extra steps that are involved when doing a sole application. 

A joint application is:

  • Faster. You don't have to serve your former spouse.
  • Cheaper. You won't have to pay any process server fees or the postage fees.
  • Easier. You don't have to attend the hearing.

Obviously, if your former spouse isn't prepared to sign one, you'll have to do the solo application.

And that's it!

If you have any trouble or any questions regarding this video or your separation, feel free to contact us on 1300 767 384 or you can email us at [email protected].

Related Posts

Protected: How To Create Useful Video Content

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Take control of your lawyer

CONTROL©

  • February 15, 2019
  • / All

No one likes things that are completely out of their control.

Especially things that they are paying for.

Particularly when the negotiations are going through a lawyer.

But unfortunately, this is how things can feel when going through a divorce.

Woman sitting on swing set looking longingly over at other empty seat.

Woman feeling lost and in low-spirits with her lack of control over her own divorce matter.

You can feel like you have little to no say in what’s being done. Little to no certainty that you are going to come out the other side in one piece.

We understand that divorce and anxiety are close friends.

We don’t think that you should have to endure any more anxiety than necessary during the legal process.

So we have developed a simple auditing process that reduces anxiety called CONTROL.

The word control all in caps with a decorative border.

Just like the name suggests, this simple auditing process helps you regain control and certainty in the legal aspects of your divorce; keeping your anxiety levels low.

CONTROL was developed on the same basis as the famous SMART criteria.

SMART is an acronym criteria used for setting goals. The objective of this criteria is to:

clarify your ideas, focus your efforts, use your time and resources productively, and increase your chances of achieving what you want in life. (Mind Tools)

Each letter in SMART is an “auditing step” to ensure your goals are clear and achievable.

Smart acronym listed out. S = specific, M= measurable, A= achievable, R= realistic, T= time bound.

Each letter of the SMART acronym defines what effective and efficient goals are.

The SMART audit forces us to develop goals that are:

  • Specific
  • Measurable
  • Achievable
  • Realistic, and
  • Time Bound

Just like SMART, CONTROL is also an acronym.

Except, CONTROL is a seven step auditing process, not five. And it is specific to auditing legal advice. So that you get FASTER results.

Here are the ‘auditing points’ of the CONTROL process:

CONTROL acronym listed out. C= cost, O= overt, N= negotiable, T= time bound, R= risk assessed, O= outcome oriented, L= legal.

Each letter in the CONTROL acronym defines what is effective and efficient legal advice, in order to achieve a fast, fair, easy and cost effective divorce.

Each letter in the CONTROL acronym is used to check that every element of work performed for you is:

  • Costed
  • Overt (clear)
  • Negotiable
  • Time Bound
  • Risk Assessed
  • Outcome Oriented, and
  • Legal

It ensures that you stay in control every step of the way. 

It ensures that you get some certainty in a very uncertain situation.

Letter c in control. C= cost.

C = Cost.

The first step in the CONTROL audit is COST.

  • 1
    Is the work costed?
  • 2
    How much will the step cost?

If both these questions can be answered before work commences and this cost is set in stone, then you will remove a lot of uncertainty that surrounds your legal fees.

Fixed costs are costs that do not change.

By definition it is:

A set amount paid for work or a service, that does not change with the time the work takes or the amount the service is used (Lexicon, 2017).

Meaning no matter how long something takes to do or how much work has to be performed the cost agreed upon never changes. Not a dollar or even a cent more.

Fixed costs or fixed fees (as they may also be called) work by giving a fixed price for each stage of the legal process.

Diagram showing the stages and a locked in price for each.

Each letter is a stage of the divorce process. Fixed fees means that that cost to get to each stage (to get from A to B and so on) is locked in.

This fixed price is determined by assessing what work needs to be done based on the average cost of similar cases.

An added allowance will be made for possible risks that may be involved.

Illustration showing the fixed fee pricing process.

Lawyer analyses the work and assesses for possible risks adding an extra allowance for these. 

The final result should be a set fee that sits somewhere in the middle of the price range quoted by lawyers who charge by the hour.

Scale showing how much costs can vary with lawyers who charge hourly rates versus fixed fee lawyers.

The cost of using a lawyer who charges by the hour can be anything from a small bill to a huge bill. Lawyers who use fixed fees will always have a certain price that won't change.

Costing process of fixed fees. Fixed costs work by giving a fixed price for each stage of the legal process. This fixed price is determined by assessing what work needs to be done based on the average costs of similar cases. An added allowance will be made for possible risks that may be involved. The final result should be a set fee that sits somewhere in the middle of the price range quoted by lawyers who charge by the hour.

Illustration explaining the fixed fee process and how it works.

Example:

Shelly needs to draft an affidavit (aka her version of events). Using lawyers on hourly rates the end cost of this can be anywhere from $200 all the way up to $2,000. Instead with a fixed fee, in Shelly’s situation, she was given a set price of $1,200.

Illustration of how paid by the hour lawyers can charge anywhere from $200 to $2,000. On the other hand fixed fee lawyers have a set price for $1,200 guaranteed.
Illustration of how paid by the hour lawyers can charge anywhere from $200 to $2,000. On the other hand fixed fee lawyers have a set price for $1,200 guaranteed.

This fixed fee is therefore very beneficial to Shelly. It gives her certainty about what her legal costs will be. It gives her control. It allows her to consider if the amount is right for her.

Shelly can budget for this amount; knowing that she will also be able to pay all of her other never-ending bills.

Woman budgeting with a smile on her face.

Shelly budgeting for the month. She is happy knowing she will be able to pay all her bills.

Accurate budgeting is not possible when you hire professionals who charge on an hourly basis.

Where cost is based on time.

Where you are paying for every minute that someone works – whether that’s:

  • Reviewing huge documents
  • Drafting lengthy letters, or
  • Time spent on endless phone calls.

When you have uncapped hourly legal rates you lose control of the cost you pay.

It’s just the same as hiring a painter to paint a room in your house;

  • Do you want to pay them by the hour?
  • When you’re not there?
  • When the painter is watching Netflix in your lounge room?
  • Or do you want to pay them to paint the room?
Painter sleeping on the couch.

Painter having a sleep on your couch, while you are out, even though you are paying him per hour.

So it begs the question - why would you hire a lawyer to do your divorce negotiations without knowing exactly how much it’s going to cost?

Often you are forced to hire lawyers who charge by the hour because it’s the only option.

But, now you know there is a better way.

Fixed fees at certain stages.

When people are offered the project management fixed fee option (the certain option), nine times out of ten, people will choose this over an hourly rate.

And that’s because:

  • It's less risky.
  • You get greater certainty & peace of mind.
  • It increases the incentive of the person working for you (lawyer or whoever) because the more time they take simply means they are working for free. And 'free' is not a good business model!
  • It's more efficient
  • It focuses on value and results not hours worked (time billing focuses on quantity not quality).
  • It encourages communication. The client won’t hesitate to call and ask questions, or offer suggestions. They won’t hesitate as they know that the phone calls are included in an “all you can eat” package! Time billing does not encourage communication as clients are hesitant to call because they are unsure if they are being charged for every point of contact.
  • It allows you to accurately budget so that you know you can afford that night off with your mates.
Letter o in control. O= Overt.

O = Overt = clear.

The second step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is OVERT - a big word that means clear.

But we couldn’t spell CONTROL with 2 C’s.

CONTROL couldn’t be spelled CCNTROL.

So we needed a word that meant clear.

A word beginning with O.

A word like overt. And here’s what it means:

open to view or knowledge; not concealed or secret” (Dictionary.com)

So as it turns out, it really means super clear!

As a result, for this step in the audit you should be checking that everything is super clear.

So that you completely understand what is going on.

So that the advice given cannot be interpreted in any other way.

So that everything is in plain English.

Lawyer having a conversation with her happy client.

Lawyer speaking to her client in plain English. 

What does it mean to speak in plain English?

Well plain English is defined as:

Communication your audience can understand the first time they read or hear it (plainlanguage.gov).

It is clear, concise and well-organised. It is easy to read and understand.

It’s not the use of big, confusing words like “litigant”. If a word like “litigant” is needed it needs to be explained in a way in which you understand.

Litigant simply refers to an individual who is going to court.

By doing so, what is written, becomes easy to understand. As no one needs confusion.

Unfortunately, at times, professionals do get caught up in their own worlds.

They get so caught up that they don’t realise that their industry language isn’t understandable to everyday normal human beings.

It’s something we like to call the ‘Curse of Knowledge’: Knowing something particular to your place of work and then just assuming everyone else understands it as well as you.

The following graph shows this:

Curse of knowledge graph. Includes a green line for assumption accuracy and a blue line for knowledge. The two lines meet at point A. Anything after that point is language that can be understood.

Diagram illustrating the 'Curse of Knowledge'.

  • The green line is what the professional assumes you know.
  • The blue line is what you actually know.
  • It is only when the assumed knowledge and actual knowledge cross (Point A above) that things are clear and understandable.

Which is what both the professional and client want; to be understood and to understand.

For most professionals they don’t even realise they are using language that is foreign to the client. But most of them are happy to clear things up if you are unsure or don’t understand.

You should never feel silly for asking for clarification.

After all it is your money you are spending. So you better be sure you know what the advice means.

Lawyers can avoid the 'Curse Of Knowledge' by using readability tools like Flesh Kincaid.

We use tools such as Flesh Kincaid to analyse our written communication. To see how easy it is to read and understand. To ensure our work can be understood by a high school student.

This is to make sure everything is clear and not overly complicated.

High school student with woman reading documents and smiling.

Both Shelly and her young niece (who is in high school) can understand the legal documents.

A professional should never make you feel stupid.

A professional will want you to be able to understand instantly so they can get your approval to keep things moving. 

The professional who tries to purposely confuse you is not the person you want on your side.

They won’t give you clear answers on what they are doing.

Instead they will give you the run around. Where you pay a lot of money for nothing to be achieved.

Example:

Shelly wanted a lawyer to put together her affidavit (document outlining her version of events). Shelly went to a lawyer who said:

Example of Shelly's lawyer saying "an affidavit will be drafted. It will be filled with an interim application" and Shelly not understanding what the lawyer is saying.

Shelly has no idea what her lawyer is saying. He is suffering from the 'Curse of Knowledge' and not using plain English.

Example of Shelly's lawyer saying "an affidavit will be drafted. It will be filled with an interim application" and Shelly not understanding what the lawyer is saying.

Shelly has no idea what her lawyer is saying. He is suffering from the 'Curse of Knowledge' and not using plain English.

Shelly had no idea what was meant.

Shelly had no knowledge or experience with family law.

And Shelly is afraid to ask the lawyer what he means by this.

By not using plain English this lawyer has already begun to waste time and drag things out​ (making himself more money in the process).

This is because communication has to then go back and forth.

Back and forth.

And back and forth until Shelly understands.

Or until Shelly simply gives up and gives the go ahead to something she doesn’t understand. Until it’s too late. And she asks for it to be changed.

But it’s not all doom and gloom.

By hiring someone who uses plain English to explain each step clearly, from milestone to milestone, you will understand what is going on.

Meaning you:

  • Can be confident in achieving a successful outcome.
  • Can have peace of mind knowing exactly what's going on.
  • Won't waste time or money.
  • Will probably understand the law as it relates to your case better than anyone else! 
Letter n in control. N = negotiable.

N= Negotiable.

The third step in the CONTROL audit is to ensure the advice you receive is NEGOTIABLE.

In simple terms:

  • 1
    Will the advice paint you into a corner?
  • 2
    Has it left you some ‘wriggle room’ to negotiate a better outcome?

The critical skill of a lawyer is the ability to negotiate a good deal. To find the sweet spot in which both parties are willing to settle.

​Negotiation is based on flexibility. Not painting you into a corner.

​Therefore you need to ensure every move made by your legal professional contains all three negotiation positions:

  • 1
    Opening position. What you demand. What you initially offer to settle for.
  • 2
    Fall-back position. What you do (and offer) if the original offer fails (if your opening position is rejected).
  • 3
    Walk away position. Otherwise known as the bottom line position. The worst possible outcome that you will accept. The last offer that you will settle for.

See the illustration below:

Negotiations Of buying & selling a house

Illustration of a buyer and seller going through negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement for the price of the house is made.

Negotiation process of buying and selling a house.

Illustration of a buyer and seller going through negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement for the price of the house is made.

Negotiation process of buying and selling a house.

These three positions in negotiations are known as the solutions that you want.

  • 1
    You start with your opening offer. In this example above, this is the seller listing the house at $500,000 (number 1).
  • 2
    The buyer will most likely reject this offer and offer their opening offer, something which could be in your walk away position. The point in which you will not sell. For this example this is $390,000 (number 2).
  • 3
    In response to this much lower opening offer by the other side the seller will then make a counter offer. A fall-back position where you make another more desirable offer to the other side. In this case above this is a reduction in cost of the house; $450,000 (number 3).
  • 4
    These counter offers go back and forth between the buyer and seller in the fall back position (number 4, 5 and 6).
  • 5
    Back and forth. 
  • 6
    Back and forth.
  • 7
    Until a settlement has been reached; both parties agree on a price of $425,000 (number 7 & 8).

If your lawyer has negotiable advice he will have further fall-back offers planned if that offer is yet again rejected (number 9 and 10).

These fall back offers will continue until they finally reach the clients bottom line (number 11 and 12).

A point in which they will walk away from negotiations if this final offer isn’t accepted.

A point in which the house will remain on the market if neither party will come above or below the others bottom line (above $400,000 or below $470,000).

Person handling over the house keys to another person in front of a sold sign.

Handing over the house keys after negotiations have happened and both people have reached an agreement on the selling price of the house.

The same should occur for your divorce.

You should know:

  • 1
    What your opening offer will be,
  • 2
    What your fall-back offers will be, and 
  • 3
    What your walk away point will be.

By knowing what your positions are and by anticipating what your spouse’s positions will be, you and your legal professional will be able to negotiate a successful settlement for you.

Example:

Shelly wanted:

Shelly wants at least 50% child custody and to own 100% of the family home.

What Shelly wishes to leave the marriage with. 

The other assets (shares and investment properties) Shelly and her ex-husband Peter had accumulated over their relationship did not matter as much to Shelly. Therefore she was willing to sacrifice on that.

Shelly also anticipated that Peter didn’t want her leaving with half or more of the investment assets. Because of this, she assumed that he would sacrifice on the house.

To ensure Shelly got exactly what she wanted her lawyer set the following three negotiation positions:

Shelly's three negotiation positions.

Shelly's three negotiation positions.

Based on these positions and an analysis of Shelly’s & Peter’s relationship, Shelly’s lawyer will negotiate with the other side.

This is to ensure Shelly isn’t pressured into a settlement she doesn’t want or deserve.

The lawyer who ensures his advice is negotiable by establishing these three positions will be a stronger negotiator because he is prepared for different situations.

For Shelly the resulting negotiation went like this:

Illustration of a Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement has been reached.

Demonstration of Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. 

Illustration of a Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement has been reached.

Demonstration of Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. 

  • 1
    Shelly’s lawyer opened with Shelly’s opening offer: Willing to settle for the family home, 100% child custody and 80% of the assets (number 1 on the illustration).
  • 2
    Peter’s lawyer then came back with their opening offer of wanting the same thing: Peter is willing to settle for the family home, 100% child custody and 80% of the assets (number 2).
  • 3
    Both lawyers then went back and forth in the fall-back position, moving from the first fall back to the second and so on until both parties offers began to narrow into a desired result. (number 3, 4, 5 and 6).
  • 7
    They finally reached a point in which Shelly and Peter were in agreement. A settlement was reached and finalised (number 7 & 8). For Shelly she received a successful result – 50% child custody, 100% ownership of the family home and 30% of their assets.

By having a legal professional who has these three negotiation positions, you won’t be painted into a corner.

You will have a plan for every scenario.

Know what to do if the other side does something.

Know where you stand, how much ‘wriggle room’ you have and at what point you walk away.  

Ensuring you are never in a position where you are stuck.

The benefits of this are:

  • You aren’t pressured or forced into a settlement or action you don’t want to take.
  • You are in control of the situation knowing when you want to settle and when you will walk away.
  • You and your lawyer (or other legal professional) are on the same page on what you want and how you want to get there.
  • You always have a plan for every situation.
Letter t in control. T = Time bound.

T= Time bound.

The fourth step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is TIME BOUND - Does it have a deadline?

​No one wants to drag things out forever and ever.

The same goes for your divorce.

Many people want things over as quickly as possible.

And who can blame them?

You can finally close that chapter of your life, get closure and look forward to a happier future.

And that’s why it’s so important to have someone whose work and tasks are time bound. Where deadlines are set and adhered to.

Deadline written in calendar in red pen.

Deadlines are specific completion dates for specific tasks.

I’m sure you know that when you do not set deadlines (whether it be for yourself, your colleagues or whoever) things take much longer to complete.

Deadlines give us a goal.

  • They give us focus.
  • They give us urgency.
  • They give us accountability.
  • And they give us motivation.​​​​

Because when things aren’t completed by that specific deadline other things go wrong.

  • You could be in a world of trouble with your boss.
  • You may have missed the chance to buy tickets to your favourite concert.
  • Or missed a $150 discount on paying your car rego because you were one day late.

Either way it’s not something you want and as a result you tend to get things completed by the deadline.

Woman getting in trouble by boss about missing a deadline.

When you miss deadlines you can get in a world of trouble with your boss.

On the other hand, if there isn’t any deadlines, people tend to fluff about and take their time. When there is no rush to be finished by a certain date and time, we tend to fill the space.

Project management systems such as Monday.com, Asana or GANTT charts are one way that professionals keep on top of projects that need to be finished quickly, by a certain date.

Below is a GANTT chart that graphically represents a group of tasks required to build a house.
GANTT chart of building a house.

GANTT chart demonstrating the usefulness of having a visual of all tasks that need to completed as well as their specific start and finish dates.

Down the left hand side are all the tasks that need to be completed.

Along the top are the dates in which each task will start and finish.

If the house is to be finished on time, all tasks must be individually completed by it's unique finish date (the deadline). If these individual deadlines aren’t met all of the following tasks are pushed back, further delaying the project.

Illustration of worker building a house on top a floor plan.

Building a house with a plan.

For example, if the foundation is not finished by the 1st of July (A on the diagram) and instead takes until the 5th to be completed the walls will not be started until the 5th.. The roof won’t start until the 2nd of August rather than the 28th of July (B on the diagram) and so on for C, D, E, F, G and H. Which delays the completion of the house by 5 days.

This can be even more dramatic if all tasks do not meet deadlines.

  • Say the foundation went over by 5 days.
  • The walls by 8 days.
  • The roof by 10 days.
  • And the windows and doors by 12 days.

This first deadline missed has a flow on effect creating further deadlines to be missed. The project is delayed by 35 days. That’s more than a month longer than it should have taken.

Illustration of ship with cracks in ocean with a quote above that says "It's these 'little leaks' that sink 'big ships'"

Little leaks sink big ships.

By paying attention to task deadlines we are ensuring that no leaks cause the ship to sink.

These leaks are stopped using project management systems such as a GANTT chart.

They are stopped as the system provides a visual reminder early in the project to get things back on track.

GANTT charts and other project management systems also allow you to keep track of your legal professional’s progress.

You will have a deadline in which you can hold them accountable to. This gives you control and certainty over the speed of the process.

Example:

Shelly's friend Phoebe had also recently been divorced. Knowing Shelly was going through a divorce of her own, Phoebe warned Shelly of her own horror story.

About how she never got a straight answer on when things would be started and finished.

How she never knew when things would be all over.

How she never had a deadline to hold her lawyer accountable to. Which removed Phoebe's control over her own matter.

Phoebe hadn't used a project management lawyer. She hadn't used a lawyer who worked to a deadline.

Phoebe talking to Shelly looking concerned

Phoebe telling Shelly about her divorce horror story. 

When it came time for Shelly to choose her own lawyer, Shelly made sure she hired a fixed fee lawyer who used a project management approach. Where all tasks were broken down with individual deadlines for each.

These deadlines meant that Shelly was kept in the loop through the whole process. She always knew how things were tracking and when things would be started and finished.

By ensuring that every piece of advice you receive is time bound you will:

  • Stop the OTHER side from wasting time.
  • Stop your lawyer from slacking off and being lazy.
  • Make your lawyer motivated to get things done.
  • Make your lawyer focused on the task at hand, avoiding unnecessary tasks.
  • Keep your matter organised and on schedule.
  • Get certainty around when things will be completed.
  • Get control by having a date in which the lawyer is accountable for.
  • Never have to waste your time calling up and asking your lawyer how things are tracking and when things will be done.
Letter r in control. R = risk assessed.

R = Risk Assessed.

The fifth step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice has been RISK ASSESSED.

  • 1
    Have the risks associated with that piece of advice been identified?
  • 2
     Have measures been put in place to control these risks?

Divorce is a tricky process.

A process that, at times, can be full of risk.

The legal world is a world dedicated to risk avoidance and risk removal. Lawyers are “risk professionals”. Their job is to establish certainty in outcomes. By removing the risk they improve the certainty.

Hiring a legal professional that knows how to manage risk is extremely important.

Managing risk is a step-by-step process. A step-by-step process which involves 4 critical steps.

The same 4 steps that are used by Safe Work Australia (2017):

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

The four steps involved in Safe Work Australia's risk management process.

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

The four steps involved in Safe Work Australia's risk management process.

The following illustration demonstrates this process.

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

Diagram of the risk management process.

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

Diagram of the risk management process.

Just like work hazards, many legal divorce hazards and risks can be easily identified and managed.

Organised legal professionals follow these 4 steps in managing risk.

  • 1
    Identify Hazards

In order to control and manage risk first you must identify any situations or actions that could potentially harm your case. Situations or actions that could reduce your chances of receiving a successful outcome.

For family law matters hazards could be:

  • unreliable witnesses,
  • not including every piece of evidence you will rely on in your affidavit,
  • changing asset pool,
  • not meeting court deadlines,
  • sharing confidential information on social media, or even
  • re-partnering
  • 2
    Assess The Risks 

Once all hazards have been identified the risks of these hazards must be assessed. This involves considering what could happen if this hazardous situation arises and the chances of it happening. This consideration can include questions like:

  • How severe is the risk?
  • What actions can be taken to control the risk?
  • Which of these actions is the most effective in controlling the risk?
  • How urgently does action need to be taken?

By assessing these potential risks, you are able to maintain control.

Maintain control as now you have identified and assessed these risks you can now put measures in place to control them.

Example:

Peter and Shelly are getting a divorce.

They have begun the process of splitting their assets in negotiations for a property settlement.

However, Peter has just told his lawyer that he already has a new partner.

Shelly does not know about Peter’s new partner. 

Peter and new girlfriend on one side. Shelly clueless on the other side.

Peter with new partner while Shelly has no idea.

The risks with Peter’s quick re-partnering is that Shelly may act irrationally. She may:

  • Send abusive/ offensive text messages.
  • Become angry and resentful meaning she no longer wants to compromise and reach a settlement.

This could make negotiations extremely hard, dragging the out for much longer than anticipated.

  • 3
    Control The Risks 

You now know the hazards and the risks for the advice you have been given. However, knowing these isn’t enough, instead you also need to have controls in place.

Obviously the best way to control risk is to completely eliminate it, but at times this isn’t possible.

In cases where risk cannot be eliminated, then we must take actions to minimise this risk, to reduce its impact.

Some risk can be controlled with one simple action.

For others it may be a combination of several actions to provide the highest level of protection.

Either way what’s important is the fact that measures have been determined and implemented (in the most effective way for your circumstances).

Example:

Continuing from the example of Peter and Shelly above, Peter’s lawyer works with Peter to control these risks.

Peter's lawyer does so by:

  • Speeding up negotiations.
  • Advising Peter to not make his new relationship public knowledge until he and Shelly have reached an agreement on their property and parenting settlement.

By taking measures such as these Peter’s risk of an unsuccessful result and negotiations being dragged out is reduced.

This is because while Shelly is unaware of Peter’s new relationship she may be still willing to reach a fair settlement for both sides and end thing on good terms.

  • 4
    Review Control Measures 

The final step in the risk management process is checking that measures put in place to control any risks are working as planned.

By reviewing these control measures you are monitoring if these actions have been effective in eliminating/reducing risk.

You are also checking if any other hazards and risks have consequently arisen because of these control measures.

By reviewing your control measures this allows you to continue with the measures that are effectively working, revise those that aren’t and implement new actions where necessary.

Example:

For Peter this may be checking that:

  • Shelly does not know about his new relationship.
  • Negotiations haven't taken a turn with Shelly no longer willing to compromise.

Through using the right professional (a qualified lawyer) to apply these steps to assess and manage risk you are giving yourself the best chance of success.

The best chance at success as you have a qualified lawyer who has extensive experience and training in family law.

These experienced family lawyers have the best knowledge and ability to identify, assess and control risks.

You won’t be taken by surprise and you will be covered for any risks that do arise.

Ensuring that you aren’t left on the back foot.

Ensuring you stay in control despite the risks. 

Giving you the following benefits:

  • You know the risks.
  • You aren’t blindly led into a dangerous situation.
  • You have a plan.
  • You can protect yourself from risk/s.
  • You can prevent risks from happening.
  • You can make better decisions when you know the risks associated with each piece of advice.
  • You can sleep better at night knowing you have measures in place to protect you from potentially poor outcomes.
Letter o in control. O = outcome oriented.

O = Outcome Oriented.

The sixth step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is OUTCOME ORIENTATED.

  • 1
    Does each piece of advice have a goal?
  • 2
     Does each piece of advice have a milestone it is trying to reach?
  • 3
    Does each piece of advice work towards your desired end goal?

Every piece of advice and every element of work that is performed for you should work towards your desired end result. It should work towards a milestone that gets you one step closer to your end goal.

Divorce should be a milestone driven process. Start with your desired end result and break down the process into smaller milestones.

It’s just like driving from home to work.

You set your desired end result of wanting to get to work.

You map out how you are going to get there.

Divorce is like driving from home to work in city traffic, with traffic lights at nearly every intersection. It potentially can be a much harder and longer process as there are so many things that can hold you up.
Road to the city in the distance with green traffic lights along the way.

Green light run to work.

Just the same as a commute, in divorce you too want to get to the end destination as quickly as possible.

No one wants a car trip to drag on forever and ever, just the same as no one want’s their divorce to drag on forever and ever.

To arrive as quickly as possible we need a ‘green light run’ all the way through.

For each traffic light to turn green or be green at the exact point in which we hit them.

For things to be completed by a certain point in the process so we can continue to the next milestone with no delays.

Each light is a destination. An outcome.

It is pretty clear if we are at the intersection. Or not.

The lights then give us the go ahead to get to the next set of lights. The next outcome.

You are the traffic controller. You decide at each intersection what to do. Should you progress on this route; or detour?
Illustration of a traffic controller.

Traffic controller at set of lights directing drivers where to go.

Knowing your objectives provides you with the ultimate control over your success.

Telling you “what” has been achieved.

Giving you a milestone based process.

Ensuring the lawyer gets every task completed in time so that you can give them the go ahead or put them on an alternate route.

By having an outcome oriented professional you have someone who is focused on what you want to accomplish.

  • The lawyer is the driver.
  • You are the traffic controller.

You decide where you want the driver to go and when he can keep driving. The lawyer just makes sure they get to that next traffic light.

That next milestone.

That next outcome.

As fast as possible.

Ensuring that no unnecessary tasks that don’t need to be performed, aren’t.

Example:

Back to the previous example.

Shelly wanted to leave her toxic relationship with Peter.

She made a claim for:

  • 50% of child custody.
  • 100% ownership of the family home.

Shelly’s lawyer was outcome oriented and mapped out a plan of the tasks and milestones they had to reach to get Shelly this outcome.

For Shelly this was:

  • 1
    Identifying & valuing the net value of Shelly’s and Peter’s assets & debts.
  • 2
    Evaluating the contributions that both Shelly and Peter made.
  • 3
    Considering the future needs of Shelly, Peter and their children.
  • 4
    Negotiate an agreement.
  • 5
    Finalise in court.

The benefits of this approach are:

  • You aren't made to pay for (and go through) unnecessary tasks like analysing who left the relationship.
  • You know what has been achieved, what is in progress and what hasn’t yet been started.
  • You save time and money.
  • You can spend more time with your children at the beach, knowing clearly when and what your next task is and the due date.
  • Your lawyer will ring and tell you, you won’t be required to worry about anything for the next 14 days, according to the PLAN. You will hang up the phone and spontaneously books a unit for 3 days at Noosa for you and your children, because you can!
Letter l in control. L = Legal.

L = Legal.

The final step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is LEGAL!!

  • 1
    Is the advice compliant with the law?
  • 2
    Will it result in a breach?

Complying with the law prevents hold ups and unnecessary delays - that could give the other side an advantage.

Most legal non-compliance comes from rushing things, cutting corners, not paying enough attention.

It’s like driving 80km in a 50km zone in an attempt to get to your friends party.

A police man will pull you over, give you a ticket and make you arrive an hour late.

So now you have a $609 fine, 6 demerit points and have missed the food.

Something you could have avoided if you’d complied with the road rules and driven to the speed limit.

Illustration of a man in a car being written a ticket by a police man

Not abiding by the law usually ends up in fines and more wasted time than if things were done legally.

The same goes for family law matters.

If you don’t follow the rules and aren’t compliant with the law you will find yourself in a worse position.

You may be disadvantaged with penalties such as:

  • Fines
  • Paying the other person's legal costs
  • Missing out on getting the result you deserve.

But there are ways in which you can ensure that you remain compliant with Australia’s family law.

  • 1
    Read, study and understand:
  • The 316 pages of the Family Law Rules,
  • The 115 pages of the Family Law Regulations, as well as
  • Any of the Acts, Legislation, Notices, Practice directions and further regulations that relate to your situation. 

Which can be found on the Family Court of Australia's website

  • 2
    Hire a qualified legal professional on a fixed fee, fixed event basis who has studied and practiced these materials for at least 6 years. These include:
  • Solicitors (also known as lawyers),
  • Barristers,
  • Judges, 
  • Accredited Mediators,
  • Arbitrators (a qualified dispute resolution practitioner)

These professionals are the only people who are qualified and insured to give you correct legal advice.

You can check if the professional you are wanting to hire is qualified in Queensland by searching them on the Queensland Law Society website. Or by getting in contact with the Queensland Law Society directly (for Queensland only).

Client talking with her lawyer

Talking with a legal professional such as a qualified lawyer gives you the best chance of success. 

People you should NOT seek legal advice off are:

  • Your hairdresser.
  • Your fishing buddies.
  • Your marriage counselor.
  • Your financial planner.
  • And definitely NOT unqualified fraudsters posing as lawyers.

Schooling yourself up on volumes and volumes of ‘black letter’ law might not cost you money.

But it does cost you time.

It takes a lawyer about 6 years after a university degree to become fully competent and capable of running a complex matter entirely on their own.

It’s probably best to buy that experience.

What’s more if you do decide to hire a qualified legal professional you are insured (by professional indemnity insurance) for every piece of advice they give.

Insured so that you can be fairly compensated for any incorrect advice given.

Insured so that you are covered and not held accountable for any actions they take that aren’t compliant.

Example:

If Shelly's lawyer misses a critical limitation date during her property and parenting settlement and it costs Shelly money.

Shelly can sue her lawyer’s insurer for her losses.

The benefits of this are that:

  • You will be compliant. 
  • You will have the best chance at getting a successful result.
  • You will have insured advice meaning you are covered.
  • You will have peace of mind.
  • You will feel responsible for taking the right action.
  • You will be sitting at home watching a movie with a glass of wine in hand, spending quality time with the kids as you aren’t up all night trying to read and understand the rules and regulations that read something like this:
A party may apply for an interim, procedural, ancillary or other incidental order in relation to a cause of action only if: (a) that party has made an application for final orders in that cause of action; and (b) final orders have not been made on that application.  (Family Court of Australia)
Take control of your lawyer

CONTROL©

  • February 15, 2019
  • / All

No one likes things that are completely out of their control.

Especially things that they are paying for.

Particularly when the negotiations are going through a lawyer.

But unfortunately, this is how things can feel when going through a divorce.

Woman sitting on swing set looking longingly over at other empty seat.

Woman feeling lost and in low-spirits with her lack of control over her own divorce matter.

You can feel like you have little to no say in what’s being done. Little to no certainty that you are going to come out the other side in one piece.

We understand that divorce and anxiety are close friends.

We don’t think that you should have to endure any more anxiety than necessary during the legal process.

So we have developed a simple auditing process that reduces anxiety called CONTROL.

The word control all in caps with a decorative border.

Just like the name suggests, this simple auditing process helps you regain control and certainty in the legal aspects of your divorce; keeping your anxiety levels low.

CONTROL was developed on the same basis as the famous SMART criteria.

SMART is an acronym criteria used for setting goals. The objective of this criteria is to:

clarify your ideas, focus your efforts, use your time and resources productively, and increase your chances of achieving what you want in life. (Mind Tools)

Each letter in SMART is an “auditing step” to ensure your goals are clear and achievable.

Smart acronym listed out. S = specific, M= measurable, A= achievable, R= realistic, T= time bound.

Each letter of the SMART acronym defines what effective and efficient goals are.

The SMART audit forces us to develop goals that are:

  • Specific
  • Measurable
  • Achievable
  • Realistic, and
  • Time Bound

Just like SMART, CONTROL is also an acronym.

Except, CONTROL is a seven step auditing process, not five. And it is specific to auditing legal advice. So that you get FASTER results.

Here are the ‘auditing points’ of the CONTROL process:

CONTROL acronym listed out. C= cost, O= overt, N= negotiable, T= time bound, R= risk assessed, O= outcome oriented, L= legal.

Each letter in the CONTROL acronym defines what is effective and efficient legal advice, in order to achieve a fast, fair, easy and cost effective divorce.

Each letter in the CONTROL acronym is used to check that every element of work performed for you is:

  • Costed
  • Overt (clear)
  • Negotiable
  • Time Bound
  • Risk Assessed
  • Outcome Oriented, and
  • Legal

It ensures that you stay in control every step of the way. 

It ensures that you get some certainty in a very uncertain situation.

Letter c in control. C= cost.

C = Cost.

The first step in the CONTROL audit is COST.

  • 1
    Is the work costed?
  • 2
    How much will the step cost?

If both these questions can be answered before work commences and this cost is set in stone, then you will remove a lot of uncertainty that surrounds your legal fees.

Fixed costs are costs that do not change.

By definition it is:

A set amount paid for work or a service, that does not change with the time the work takes or the amount the service is used (Lexicon, 2017).

Meaning no matter how long something takes to do or how much work has to be performed the cost agreed upon never changes. Not a dollar or even a cent more.

Fixed costs or fixed fees (as they may also be called) work by giving a fixed price for each stage of the legal process.

Diagram showing the stages and a locked in price for each.

Each letter is a stage of the divorce process. Fixed fees means that that cost to get to each stage (to get from A to B and so on) is locked in.

This fixed price is determined by assessing what work needs to be done based on the average cost of similar cases.

An added allowance will be made for possible risks that may be involved.

Illustration showing the fixed fee pricing process.

Lawyer analyses the work and assesses for possible risks adding an extra allowance for these. 

The final result should be a set fee that sits somewhere in the middle of the price range quoted by lawyers who charge by the hour.

Scale showing how much costs can vary with lawyers who charge hourly rates versus fixed fee lawyers.

The cost of using a lawyer who charges by the hour can be anything from a small bill to a huge bill. Lawyers who use fixed fees will always have a certain price that won't change.

Costing process of fixed fees. Fixed costs work by giving a fixed price for each stage of the legal process. This fixed price is determined by assessing what work needs to be done based on the average costs of similar cases. An added allowance will be made for possible risks that may be involved. The final result should be a set fee that sits somewhere in the middle of the price range quoted by lawyers who charge by the hour.

Illustration explaining the fixed fee process and how it works.

Example:

Shelly needs to draft an affidavit (aka her version of events). Using lawyers on hourly rates the end cost of this can be anywhere from $200 all the way up to $2,000. Instead with a fixed fee, in Shelly’s situation, she was given a set price of $1,200.

Illustration of how paid by the hour lawyers can charge anywhere from $200 to $2,000. On the other hand fixed fee lawyers have a set price for $1,200 guaranteed.
Illustration of how paid by the hour lawyers can charge anywhere from $200 to $2,000. On the other hand fixed fee lawyers have a set price for $1,200 guaranteed.

This fixed fee is therefore very beneficial to Shelly. It gives her certainty about what her legal costs will be. It gives her control. It allows her to consider if the amount is right for her.

Shelly can budget for this amount; knowing that she will also be able to pay all of her other never-ending bills.

Woman budgeting with a smile on her face.

Shelly budgeting for the month. She is happy knowing she will be able to pay all her bills.

Accurate budgeting is not possible when you hire professionals who charge on an hourly basis.

Where cost is based on time.

Where you are paying for every minute that someone works – whether that’s:

  • Reviewing huge documents
  • Drafting lengthy letters, or
  • Time spent on endless phone calls.

When you have uncapped hourly legal rates you lose control of the cost you pay.

It’s just the same as hiring a painter to paint a room in your house;

  • Do you want to pay them by the hour?
  • When you’re not there?
  • When the painter is watching Netflix in your lounge room?
  • Or do you want to pay them to paint the room?
Painter sleeping on the couch.

Painter having a sleep on your couch, while you are out, even though you are paying him per hour.

So it begs the question - why would you hire a lawyer to do your divorce negotiations without knowing exactly how much it’s going to cost?

Often you are forced to hire lawyers who charge by the hour because it’s the only option.

But, now you know there is a better way.

Fixed fees at certain stages.

When people are offered the project management fixed fee option (the certain option), nine times out of ten, people will choose this over an hourly rate.

And that’s because:

  • It's less risky.
  • You get greater certainty & peace of mind.
  • It increases the incentive of the person working for you (lawyer or whoever) because the more time they take simply means they are working for free. And 'free' is not a good business model!
  • It's more efficient
  • It focuses on value and results not hours worked (time billing focuses on quantity not quality).
  • It encourages communication. The client won’t hesitate to call and ask questions, or offer suggestions. They won’t hesitate as they know that the phone calls are included in an “all you can eat” package! Time billing does not encourage communication as clients are hesitant to call because they are unsure if they are being charged for every point of contact.
  • It allows you to accurately budget so that you know you can afford that night off with your mates.
Letter o in control. O= Overt.

O = Overt = clear.

The second step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is OVERT - a big word that means clear.

But we couldn’t spell CONTROL with 2 C’s.

CONTROL couldn’t be spelled CCNTROL.

So we needed a word that meant clear.

A word beginning with O.

A word like overt. And here’s what it means:

open to view or knowledge; not concealed or secret” (Dictionary.com)

So as it turns out, it really means super clear!

As a result, for this step in the audit you should be checking that everything is super clear.

So that you completely understand what is going on.

So that the advice given cannot be interpreted in any other way.

So that everything is in plain English.

Lawyer having a conversation with her happy client.

Lawyer speaking to her client in plain English. 

What does it mean to speak in plain English?

Well plain English is defined as:

Communication your audience can understand the first time they read or hear it (plainlanguage.gov).

It is clear, concise and well-organised. It is easy to read and understand.

It’s not the use of big, confusing words like “litigant”. If a word like “litigant” is needed it needs to be explained in a way in which you understand.

Litigant simply refers to an individual who is going to court.

By doing so, what is written, becomes easy to understand. As no one needs confusion.

Unfortunately, at times, professionals do get caught up in their own worlds.

They get so caught up that they don’t realise that their industry language isn’t understandable to everyday normal human beings.

It’s something we like to call the ‘Curse of Knowledge’: Knowing something particular to your place of work and then just assuming everyone else understands it as well as you.

The following graph shows this:

Curse of knowledge graph. Includes a green line for assumption accuracy and a blue line for knowledge. The two lines meet at point A. Anything after that point is language that can be understood.

Diagram illustrating the 'Curse of Knowledge'.

  • The green line is what the professional assumes you know.
  • The blue line is what you actually know.
  • It is only when the assumed knowledge and actual knowledge cross (Point A above) that things are clear and understandable.

Which is what both the professional and client want; to be understood and to understand.

For most professionals they don’t even realise they are using language that is foreign to the client. But most of them are happy to clear things up if you are unsure or don’t understand.

You should never feel silly for asking for clarification.

After all it is your money you are spending. So you better be sure you know what the advice means.

Lawyers can avoid the 'Curse Of Knowledge' by using readability tools like Flesh Kincaid.

We use tools such as Flesh Kincaid to analyse our written communication. To see how easy it is to read and understand. To ensure our work can be understood by a high school student.

This is to make sure everything is clear and not overly complicated.

High school student with woman reading documents and smiling.

Both Shelly and her young niece (who is in high school) can understand the legal documents.

A professional should never make you feel stupid.

A professional will want you to be able to understand instantly so they can get your approval to keep things moving. 

The professional who tries to purposely confuse you is not the person you want on your side.

They won’t give you clear answers on what they are doing.

Instead they will give you the run around. Where you pay a lot of money for nothing to be achieved.

Example:

Shelly wanted a lawyer to put together her affidavit (document outlining her version of events). Shelly went to a lawyer who said:

Example of Shelly's lawyer saying "an affidavit will be drafted. It will be filled with an interim application" and Shelly not understanding what the lawyer is saying.

Shelly has no idea what her lawyer is saying. He is suffering from the 'Curse of Knowledge' and not using plain English.

Example of Shelly's lawyer saying "an affidavit will be drafted. It will be filled with an interim application" and Shelly not understanding what the lawyer is saying.

Shelly has no idea what her lawyer is saying. He is suffering from the 'Curse of Knowledge' and not using plain English.

Shelly had no idea what was meant.

Shelly had no knowledge or experience with family law.

And Shelly is afraid to ask the lawyer what he means by this.

By not using plain English this lawyer has already begun to waste time and drag things out​ (making himself more money in the process).

This is because communication has to then go back and forth.

Back and forth.

And back and forth until Shelly understands.

Or until Shelly simply gives up and gives the go ahead to something she doesn’t understand. Until it’s too late. And she asks for it to be changed.

But it’s not all doom and gloom.

By hiring someone who uses plain English to explain each step clearly, from milestone to milestone, you will understand what is going on.

Meaning you:

  • Can be confident in achieving a successful outcome.
  • Can have peace of mind knowing exactly what's going on.
  • Won't waste time or money.
  • Will probably understand the law as it relates to your case better than anyone else! 
Letter n in control. N = negotiable.

N= Negotiable.

The third step in the CONTROL audit is to ensure the advice you receive is NEGOTIABLE.

In simple terms:

  • 1
    Will the advice paint you into a corner?
  • 2
    Has it left you some ‘wriggle room’ to negotiate a better outcome?

The critical skill of a lawyer is the ability to negotiate a good deal. To find the sweet spot in which both parties are willing to settle.

​Negotiation is based on flexibility. Not painting you into a corner.

​Therefore you need to ensure every move made by your legal professional contains all three negotiation positions:

  • 1
    Opening position. What you demand. What you initially offer to settle for.
  • 2
    Fall-back position. What you do (and offer) if the original offer fails (if your opening position is rejected).
  • 3
    Walk away position. Otherwise known as the bottom line position. The worst possible outcome that you will accept. The last offer that you will settle for.

See the illustration below:

Negotiations Of buying & selling a house

Illustration of a buyer and seller going through negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement for the price of the house is made.

Negotiation process of buying and selling a house.

Illustration of a buyer and seller going through negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement for the price of the house is made.

Negotiation process of buying and selling a house.

These three positions in negotiations are known as the solutions that you want.

  • 1
    You start with your opening offer. In this example above, this is the seller listing the house at $500,000 (number 1).
  • 2
    The buyer will most likely reject this offer and offer their opening offer, something which could be in your walk away position. The point in which you will not sell. For this example this is $390,000 (number 2).
  • 3
    In response to this much lower opening offer by the other side the seller will then make a counter offer. A fall-back position where you make another more desirable offer to the other side. In this case above this is a reduction in cost of the house; $450,000 (number 3).
  • 4
    These counter offers go back and forth between the buyer and seller in the fall back position (number 4, 5 and 6).
  • 5
    Back and forth. 
  • 6
    Back and forth.
  • 7
    Until a settlement has been reached; both parties agree on a price of $425,000 (number 7 & 8).

If your lawyer has negotiable advice he will have further fall-back offers planned if that offer is yet again rejected (number 9 and 10).

These fall back offers will continue until they finally reach the clients bottom line (number 11 and 12).

A point in which they will walk away from negotiations if this final offer isn’t accepted.

A point in which the house will remain on the market if neither party will come above or below the others bottom line (above $400,000 or below $470,000).

Person handling over the house keys to another person in front of a sold sign.

Handing over the house keys after negotiations have happened and both people have reached an agreement on the selling price of the house.

The same should occur for your divorce.

You should know:

  • 1
    What your opening offer will be,
  • 2
    What your fall-back offers will be, and 
  • 3
    What your walk away point will be.

By knowing what your positions are and by anticipating what your spouse’s positions will be, you and your legal professional will be able to negotiate a successful settlement for you.

Example:

Shelly wanted:

Shelly wants at least 50% child custody and to own 100% of the family home.

What Shelly wishes to leave the marriage with. 

The other assets (shares and investment properties) Shelly and her ex-husband Peter had accumulated over their relationship did not matter as much to Shelly. Therefore she was willing to sacrifice on that.

Shelly also anticipated that Peter didn’t want her leaving with half or more of the investment assets. Because of this, she assumed that he would sacrifice on the house.

To ensure Shelly got exactly what she wanted her lawyer set the following three negotiation positions:

Shelly's three negotiation positions.

Shelly's three negotiation positions.

Based on these positions and an analysis of Shelly’s & Peter’s relationship, Shelly’s lawyer will negotiate with the other side.

This is to ensure Shelly isn’t pressured into a settlement she doesn’t want or deserve.

The lawyer who ensures his advice is negotiable by establishing these three positions will be a stronger negotiator because he is prepared for different situations.

For Shelly the resulting negotiation went like this:

Illustration of a Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement has been reached.

Demonstration of Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. 

Illustration of a Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. They start with their opening offers and then go back and forth in their fall back positions until an agreement has been reached.

Demonstration of Shelly's and Peter's property and parenting negotiations. 

  • 1
    Shelly’s lawyer opened with Shelly’s opening offer: Willing to settle for the family home, 100% child custody and 80% of the assets (number 1 on the illustration).
  • 2
    Peter’s lawyer then came back with their opening offer of wanting the same thing: Peter is willing to settle for the family home, 100% child custody and 80% of the assets (number 2).
  • 3
    Both lawyers then went back and forth in the fall-back position, moving from the first fall back to the second and so on until both parties offers began to narrow into a desired result. (number 3, 4, 5 and 6).
  • 7
    They finally reached a point in which Shelly and Peter were in agreement. A settlement was reached and finalised (number 7 & 8). For Shelly she received a successful result – 50% child custody, 100% ownership of the family home and 30% of their assets.

By having a legal professional who has these three negotiation positions, you won’t be painted into a corner.

You will have a plan for every scenario.

Know what to do if the other side does something.

Know where you stand, how much ‘wriggle room’ you have and at what point you walk away.  

Ensuring you are never in a position where you are stuck.

The benefits of this are:

  • You aren’t pressured or forced into a settlement or action you don’t want to take.
  • You are in control of the situation knowing when you want to settle and when you will walk away.
  • You and your lawyer (or other legal professional) are on the same page on what you want and how you want to get there.
  • You always have a plan for every situation.
Letter t in control. T = Time bound.

T= Time bound.

The fourth step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is TIME BOUND - Does it have a deadline?

​No one wants to drag things out forever and ever.

The same goes for your divorce.

Many people want things over as quickly as possible.

And who can blame them?

You can finally close that chapter of your life, get closure and look forward to a happier future.

And that’s why it’s so important to have someone whose work and tasks are time bound. Where deadlines are set and adhered to.

Deadline written in calendar in red pen.

Deadlines are specific completion dates for specific tasks.

I’m sure you know that when you do not set deadlines (whether it be for yourself, your colleagues or whoever) things take much longer to complete.

Deadlines give us a goal.

  • They give us focus.
  • They give us urgency.
  • They give us accountability.
  • And they give us motivation.​​​​

Because when things aren’t completed by that specific deadline other things go wrong.

  • You could be in a world of trouble with your boss.
  • You may have missed the chance to buy tickets to your favourite concert.
  • Or missed a $150 discount on paying your car rego because you were one day late.

Either way it’s not something you want and as a result you tend to get things completed by the deadline.

Woman getting in trouble by boss about missing a deadline.

When you miss deadlines you can get in a world of trouble with your boss.

On the other hand, if there isn’t any deadlines, people tend to fluff about and take their time. When there is no rush to be finished by a certain date and time, we tend to fill the space.

Project management systems such as Monday.com, Asana or GANTT charts are one way that professionals keep on top of projects that need to be finished quickly, by a certain date.

Below is a GANTT chart that graphically represents a group of tasks required to build a house.
GANTT chart of building a house.

GANTT chart demonstrating the usefulness of having a visual of all tasks that need to completed as well as their specific start and finish dates.

Down the left hand side are all the tasks that need to be completed.

Along the top are the dates in which each task will start and finish.

If the house is to be finished on time, all tasks must be individually completed by it's unique finish date (the deadline). If these individual deadlines aren’t met all of the following tasks are pushed back, further delaying the project.

Illustration of worker building a house on top a floor plan.

Building a house with a plan.

For example, if the foundation is not finished by the 1st of July (A on the diagram) and instead takes until the 5th to be completed the walls will not be started until the 5th.. The roof won’t start until the 2nd of August rather than the 28th of July (B on the diagram) and so on for C, D, E, F, G and H. Which delays the completion of the house by 5 days.

This can be even more dramatic if all tasks do not meet deadlines.

  • Say the foundation went over by 5 days.
  • The walls by 8 days.
  • The roof by 10 days.
  • And the windows and doors by 12 days.

This first deadline missed has a flow on effect creating further deadlines to be missed. The project is delayed by 35 days. That’s more than a month longer than it should have taken.

Illustration of ship with cracks in ocean with a quote above that says "It's these 'little leaks' that sink 'big ships'"

Little leaks sink big ships.

By paying attention to task deadlines we are ensuring that no leaks cause the ship to sink.

These leaks are stopped using project management systems such as a GANTT chart.

They are stopped as the system provides a visual reminder early in the project to get things back on track.

GANTT charts and other project management systems also allow you to keep track of your legal professional’s progress.

You will have a deadline in which you can hold them accountable to. This gives you control and certainty over the speed of the process.

Example:

Shelly's friend Phoebe had also recently been divorced. Knowing Shelly was going through a divorce of her own, Phoebe warned Shelly of her own horror story.

About how she never got a straight answer on when things would be started and finished.

How she never knew when things would be all over.

How she never had a deadline to hold her lawyer accountable to. Which removed Phoebe's control over her own matter.

Phoebe hadn't used a project management lawyer. She hadn't used a lawyer who worked to a deadline.

Phoebe talking to Shelly looking concerned

Phoebe telling Shelly about her divorce horror story. 

When it came time for Shelly to choose her own lawyer, Shelly made sure she hired a fixed fee lawyer who used a project management approach. Where all tasks were broken down with individual deadlines for each.

These deadlines meant that Shelly was kept in the loop through the whole process. She always knew how things were tracking and when things would be started and finished.

By ensuring that every piece of advice you receive is time bound you will:

  • Stop the OTHER side from wasting time.
  • Stop your lawyer from slacking off and being lazy.
  • Make your lawyer motivated to get things done.
  • Make your lawyer focused on the task at hand, avoiding unnecessary tasks.
  • Keep your matter organised and on schedule.
  • Get certainty around when things will be completed.
  • Get control by having a date in which the lawyer is accountable for.
  • Never have to waste your time calling up and asking your lawyer how things are tracking and when things will be done.
Letter r in control. R = risk assessed.

R = Risk Assessed.

The fifth step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice has been RISK ASSESSED.

  • 1
    Have the risks associated with that piece of advice been identified?
  • 2
     Have measures been put in place to control these risks?

Divorce is a tricky process.

A process that, at times, can be full of risk.

The legal world is a world dedicated to risk avoidance and risk removal. Lawyers are “risk professionals”. Their job is to establish certainty in outcomes. By removing the risk they improve the certainty.

Hiring a legal professional that knows how to manage risk is extremely important.

Managing risk is a step-by-step process. A step-by-step process which involves 4 critical steps.

The same 4 steps that are used by Safe Work Australia (2017):

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

The four steps involved in Safe Work Australia's risk management process.

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

The four steps involved in Safe Work Australia's risk management process.

The following illustration demonstrates this process.

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

Diagram of the risk management process.

Diagram of the risk management process. You start with identifying hazards, then assessing risks, then controlling risks and finally reviewing control measures.

Diagram of the risk management process.

Just like work hazards, many legal divorce hazards and risks can be easily identified and managed.

Organised legal professionals follow these 4 steps in managing risk.

  • 1
    Identify Hazards

In order to control and manage risk first you must identify any situations or actions that could potentially harm your case. Situations or actions that could reduce your chances of receiving a successful outcome.

For family law matters hazards could be:

  • unreliable witnesses,
  • not including every piece of evidence you will rely on in your affidavit,
  • changing asset pool,
  • not meeting court deadlines,
  • sharing confidential information on social media, or even
  • re-partnering
  • 2
    Assess The Risks 

Once all hazards have been identified the risks of these hazards must be assessed. This involves considering what could happen if this hazardous situation arises and the chances of it happening. This consideration can include questions like:

  • How severe is the risk?
  • What actions can be taken to control the risk?
  • Which of these actions is the most effective in controlling the risk?
  • How urgently does action need to be taken?

By assessing these potential risks, you are able to maintain control.

Maintain control as now you have identified and assessed these risks you can now put measures in place to control them.

Example:

Peter and Shelly are getting a divorce.

They have begun the process of splitting their assets in negotiations for a property settlement.

However, Peter has just told his lawyer that he already has a new partner.

Shelly does not know about Peter’s new partner. 

Peter and new girlfriend on one side. Shelly clueless on the other side.

Peter with new partner while Shelly has no idea.

The risks with Peter’s quick re-partnering is that Shelly may act irrationally. She may:

  • Send abusive/ offensive text messages.
  • Become angry and resentful meaning she no longer wants to compromise and reach a settlement.

This could make negotiations extremely hard, dragging the out for much longer than anticipated.

  • 3
    Control The Risks 

You now know the hazards and the risks for the advice you have been given. However, knowing these isn’t enough, instead you also need to have controls in place.

Obviously the best way to control risk is to completely eliminate it, but at times this isn’t possible.

In cases where risk cannot be eliminated, then we must take actions to minimise this risk, to reduce its impact.

Some risk can be controlled with one simple action.

For others it may be a combination of several actions to provide the highest level of protection.

Either way what’s important is the fact that measures have been determined and implemented (in the most effective way for your circumstances).

Example:

Continuing from the example of Peter and Shelly above, Peter’s lawyer works with Peter to control these risks.

Peter's lawyer does so by:

  • Speeding up negotiations.
  • Advising Peter to not make his new relationship public knowledge until he and Shelly have reached an agreement on their property and parenting settlement.

By taking measures such as these Peter’s risk of an unsuccessful result and negotiations being dragged out is reduced.

This is because while Shelly is unaware of Peter’s new relationship she may be still willing to reach a fair settlement for both sides and end thing on good terms.

  • 4
    Review Control Measures 

The final step in the risk management process is checking that measures put in place to control any risks are working as planned.

By reviewing these control measures you are monitoring if these actions have been effective in eliminating/reducing risk.

You are also checking if any other hazards and risks have consequently arisen because of these control measures.

By reviewing your control measures this allows you to continue with the measures that are effectively working, revise those that aren’t and implement new actions where necessary.

Example:

For Peter this may be checking that:

  • Shelly does not know about his new relationship.
  • Negotiations haven't taken a turn with Shelly no longer willing to compromise.

Through using the right professional (a qualified lawyer) to apply these steps to assess and manage risk you are giving yourself the best chance of success.

The best chance at success as you have a qualified lawyer who has extensive experience and training in family law.

These experienced family lawyers have the best knowledge and ability to identify, assess and control risks.

You won’t be taken by surprise and you will be covered for any risks that do arise.

Ensuring that you aren’t left on the back foot.

Ensuring you stay in control despite the risks. 

Giving you the following benefits:

  • You know the risks.
  • You aren’t blindly led into a dangerous situation.
  • You have a plan.
  • You can protect yourself from risk/s.
  • You can prevent risks from happening.
  • You can make better decisions when you know the risks associated with each piece of advice.
  • You can sleep better at night knowing you have measures in place to protect you from potentially poor outcomes.
Letter o in control. O = outcome oriented.

O = Outcome Oriented.

The sixth step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is OUTCOME ORIENTATED.

  • 1
    Does each piece of advice have a goal?
  • 2
     Does each piece of advice have a milestone it is trying to reach?
  • 3
    Does each piece of advice work towards your desired end goal?

Every piece of advice and every element of work that is performed for you should work towards your desired end result. It should work towards a milestone that gets you one step closer to your end goal.

Divorce should be a milestone driven process. Start with your desired end result and break down the process into smaller milestones.

It’s just like driving from home to work.

You set your desired end result of wanting to get to work.

You map out how you are going to get there.

Divorce is like driving from home to work in city traffic, with traffic lights at nearly every intersection. It potentially can be a much harder and longer process as there are so many things that can hold you up.
Road to the city in the distance with green traffic lights along the way.

Green light run to work.

Just the same as a commute, in divorce you too want to get to the end destination as quickly as possible.

No one wants a car trip to drag on forever and ever, just the same as no one want’s their divorce to drag on forever and ever.

To arrive as quickly as possible we need a ‘green light run’ all the way through.

For each traffic light to turn green or be green at the exact point in which we hit them.

For things to be completed by a certain point in the process so we can continue to the next milestone with no delays.

Each light is a destination. An outcome.

It is pretty clear if we are at the intersection. Or not.

The lights then give us the go ahead to get to the next set of lights. The next outcome.

You are the traffic controller. You decide at each intersection what to do. Should you progress on this route; or detour?
Illustration of a traffic controller.

Traffic controller at set of lights directing drivers where to go.

Knowing your objectives provides you with the ultimate control over your success.

Telling you “what” has been achieved.

Giving you a milestone based process.

Ensuring the lawyer gets every task completed in time so that you can give them the go ahead or put them on an alternate route.

By having an outcome oriented professional you have someone who is focused on what you want to accomplish.

  • The lawyer is the driver.
  • You are the traffic controller.

You decide where you want the driver to go and when he can keep driving. The lawyer just makes sure they get to that next traffic light.

That next milestone.

That next outcome.

As fast as possible.

Ensuring that no unnecessary tasks that don’t need to be performed, aren’t.

Example:

Back to the previous example.

Shelly wanted to leave her toxic relationship with Peter.

She made a claim for:

  • 50% of child custody.
  • 100% ownership of the family home.

Shelly’s lawyer was outcome oriented and mapped out a plan of the tasks and milestones they had to reach to get Shelly this outcome.

For Shelly this was:

  • 1
    Identifying & valuing the net value of Shelly’s and Peter’s assets & debts.
  • 2
    Evaluating the contributions that both Shelly and Peter made.
  • 3
    Considering the future needs of Shelly, Peter and their children.
  • 4
    Negotiate an agreement.
  • 5
    Finalise in court.

The benefits of this approach are:

  • You aren't made to pay for (and go through) unnecessary tasks like analysing who left the relationship.
  • You know what has been achieved, what is in progress and what hasn’t yet been started.
  • You save time and money.
  • You can spend more time with your children at the beach, knowing clearly when and what your next task is and the due date.
  • Your lawyer will ring and tell you, you won’t be required to worry about anything for the next 14 days, according to the PLAN. You will hang up the phone and spontaneously books a unit for 3 days at Noosa for you and your children, because you can!
Letter l in control. L = Legal.

L = Legal.

The final step in the CONTROL audit is to assess whether the advice is LEGAL!!

  • 1
    Is the advice compliant with the law?
  • 2
    Will it result in a breach?

Complying with the law prevents hold ups and unnecessary delays - that could give the other side an advantage.

Most legal non-compliance comes from rushing things, cutting corners, not paying enough attention.

It’s like driving 80km in a 50km zone in an attempt to get to your friends party.

A police man will pull you over, give you a ticket and make you arrive an hour late.

So now you have a $609 fine, 6 demerit points and have missed the food.

Something you could have avoided if you’d complied with the road rules and driven to the speed limit.

Illustration of a man in a car being written a ticket by a police man

Not abiding by the law usually ends up in fines and more wasted time than if things were done legally.

The same goes for family law matters.

If you don’t follow the rules and aren’t compliant with the law you will find yourself in a worse position.

You may be disadvantaged with penalties such as:

  • Fines
  • Paying the other person's legal costs
  • Missing out on getting the result you deserve.

But there are ways in which you can ensure that you remain compliant with Australia’s family law.

  • 1
    Read, study and understand:
  • The 316 pages of the Family Law Rules,
  • The 115 pages of the Family Law Regulations, as well as
  • Any of the Acts, Legislation, Notices, Practice directions and further regulations that relate to your situation. 

Which can be found on the Family Court of Australia's website

  • 2
    Hire a qualified legal professional on a fixed fee, fixed event basis who has studied and practiced these materials for at least 6 years. These include:
  • Solicitors (also known as lawyers),
  • Barristers,
  • Judges, 
  • Accredited Mediators,
  • Arbitrators (a qualified dispute resolution practitioner)

These professionals are the only people who are qualified and insured to give you correct legal advice.

You can check if the professional you are wanting to hire is qualified in Queensland by searching them on the Queensland Law Society website. Or by getting in contact with the Queensland Law Society directly (for Queensland only).

Client talking with her lawyer

Talking with a legal professional such as a qualified lawyer gives you the best chance of success. 

People you should NOT seek legal advice off are:

  • Your hairdresser.
  • Your fishing buddies.
  • Your marriage counselor.
  • Your financial planner.
  • And definitely NOT unqualified fraudsters posing as lawyers.

Schooling yourself up on volumes and volumes of ‘black letter’ law might not cost you money.

But it does cost you time.

It takes a lawyer about 6 years after a university degree to become fully competent and capable of running a complex matter entirely on their own.

It’s probably best to buy that experience.

What’s more if you do decide to hire a qualified legal professional you are insured (by professional indemnity insurance) for every piece of advice they give.

Insured so that you can be fairly compensated for any incorrect advice given.

Insured so that you are covered and not held accountable for any actions they take that aren’t compliant.

Example:

If Shelly's lawyer misses a critical limitation date during her property and parenting settlement and it costs Shelly money.

Shelly can sue her lawyer’s insurer for her losses.

The benefits of this are that:

  • You will be compliant. 
  • You will have the best chance at getting a successful result.
  • You will have insured advice meaning you are covered.
  • You will have peace of mind.
  • You will feel responsible for taking the right action.
  • You will be sitting at home watching a movie with a glass of wine in hand, spending quality time with the kids as you aren’t up all night trying to read and understand the rules and regulations that read something like this:
A party may apply for an interim, procedural, ancillary or other incidental order in relation to a cause of action only if: (a) that party has made an application for final orders in that cause of action; and (b) final orders have not been made on that application.  (Family Court of Australia)